Commit Graph
522 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
EthanHealy01andJames Brunton 1a770af47c fix create tool in the AI chat (#6673)
AI PDF creation ("create a PDF for me") has been broken since the
Policies backend (#6527) introduced PolicyExecutor as the tool execution
pipeline. PolicyExecutor runs normal single-input tools with a per-file
loop, but generator tools like `create-pdf-from-html-agent` take no
input file and build their output purely from parameters. With zero
input files the loop ran zero times, so the endpoint was never called
and the step silently produced nothing. The chat reported success
("Created Purchase Order") while no document ever appeared.

This adds an `else if (inputFiles.isEmpty())` branch so a generator tool
is called once with an empty file list, matching what the multi-input
branch already does for an empty input. Two files changed: the
one-line-ish fix in `PolicyExecutor`, and a regression test covering the
no-input case.

---------

Co-authored-by: James Brunton <jbrunton96@gmail.com>
2026-06-19 17:06:28 +00:00
Anthony Stirling 3870ac3d7d Add desktop mobile-upload page and fix LAN QR URL (#6736)
# Description of Changes

Desktop can not use QR code upload due to API backend not having UI for
it...
Because of this we add UI, has to be custom because can not support
OpenCV and in app camera due to its https requirement

<img width="919" height="2048" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d84c3903-fd23-421a-8919-24d89ba6c753"
/>
<img width="919" height="2048" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d6c8fdf3-837b-4dc3-92ea-37f7502f8462"
/>
<img width="919" height="2048" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fd4ce3b4-69ad-45dd-b066-bff2d082c583"
/>

<img width="1550" height="790" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/701d4dcc-ebd6-4e03-aa7b-2d8623525fc9"
/>

---

## Checklist

### General

- [ ] I have read the [Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to
Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings

### Documentation

- [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc
repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/)
(if functionality has heavily changed)
- [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation
Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags)
(for new translation tags only)

### Translations (if applicable)

- [ ] I ran
[`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md)

### UI Changes (if applicable)

- [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached
(e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR)

### Testing (if applicable)

- [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests
pass
- [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing)
for more details.
2026-06-19 15:33:49 +00:00
stirlingbot[bot] 3456316569 Update Backend 3rd Party Licenses (#6719)
Auto-generated by stirlingbot[bot]

This PR updates the backend license report based on dependency changes.

Signed-off-by: stirlingbot[bot] <stirlingbot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: stirlingbot[bot] <195170888+stirlingbot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-18 19:54:02 +00:00
Anthony StirlingandEthanHealy01 215bba39bc Give SaaS users their own team and harden the user list endpoint (#6717)
# Description of Changes

Previously, new SaaS users were placed on a shared Default team and then
migrated to their own. A race (or a failed migration, or an
anonymous→registered upgrade) could leave them stuck on that shared
team, where unrelated users could see each other
Instead they now get their own personal team during creation so
unrelated users no longer collide on one team. SaaS-only
(@Profile("saas")); self-host's Default behaviour is untouched.
Also happens during call to avoid uncaught users

Scope GET /api/v1/user/users. Anonymous callers get 403; a caller on a
system team (Default/Internal) gets only themselves, not the team's
members.

---

## Checklist

### General

- [ ] I have read the [Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to
Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings

### Documentation

- [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc
repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/)
(if functionality has heavily changed)
- [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation
Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags)
(for new translation tags only)

### Translations (if applicable)

- [ ] I ran
[`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md)

### UI Changes (if applicable)

- [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached
(e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR)

### Testing (if applicable)

- [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests
pass
- [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing)
for more details.

---------

Co-authored-by: EthanHealy01 <80844253+EthanHealy01@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-18 16:27:22 +00:00
ConnorYohandEthanHealy01 900b66b030 chore(saas): remove dead ErrorTrackingService island + credits path exclusion (#6718)
## What

Residual dead-code cleanup following the credits engine teardown
(#6687).

- **Delete the `ErrorTrackingService` dead island** (6 files): the
service, `UserErrorTrackerRepository`, `UserErrorTracker`,
`ProcessingErrorType`, `CreditsProperties`, and
`ErrorTrackingServiceTest`. These formed a self-referential cluster with
**zero external callers** once the credit machinery was removed.
- **Remove `/api/v1/credits/**`** from both `excludePathPatterns` blocks
in `PaygWebMvcConfig` — the credits controller no longer exists, so the
exclusion is defunct. (spotless collapsed the lists to one line.)

## Verification

- `./gradlew :saas:compileJava :saas:compileTestJava` → **BUILD
SUCCESSFUL**
- grep confirms zero dangling references to the deleted types

## Not in scope (deliberately deferred)

Destructive DB drops
(`user_credits`/`team_credits`/`user_subscription_plans` tables, dead
`payg_shadow_charge` columns, `user_error_tracker` table) are gated
behind the post-release soak (`live_ratio==1.0 ≥7d`) and tracked in a
separate bundle.

Co-authored-by: EthanHealy01 <80844253+EthanHealy01@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-18 14:32:54 +00:00
Anthony StirlingandEthanHealy01 c8925acee7 add prerendered Open Graph previews and OG card generator (#6661)
# Description of Changes

add prerendered Open Graph previews and OG card generator
so that /compresss etc shows a pre generated static html file (Since
google etc doenst render javascript)


---

## Checklist

### General

- [ ] I have read the [Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to
Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings

### Documentation

- [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc
repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/)
(if functionality has heavily changed)
- [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation
Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags)
(for new translation tags only)

### Translations (if applicable)

- [ ] I ran
[`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md)

### UI Changes (if applicable)

- [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached
(e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR)

### Testing (if applicable)

- [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests
pass
- [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing)
for more details.

---------

Co-authored-by: EthanHealy01 <80844253+EthanHealy01@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-18 13:49:16 +00:00
Reece Browne 8f46ca0d92 feat(policies): lock policies to the SaaS build + profile (#6702)
## What & why

Policies (automation-backed enforcement) execute and bill through the
cloud backend, so the feature should only be available in the hosted
**SaaS** product — not in self-hosted proprietary or core builds. Today
it's enabled in the proprietary build (and the API is exposed in any
proprietary backend), so this locks it to SaaS on both layers.

## Frontend (build-flavor gate)

`POLICIES_ENABLED` is the single gate `usePoliciesEnabled` uses (rail +
auto-run controller).

- `proprietary` flag → **`false`** (self-hosted web no longer shows
policies)
- new `src/saas/constants/featureFlags.ts` → re-exports proprietary
flags, overrides `POLICIES_ENABLED = true`
- new `src/desktop/constants/featureFlags.ts` → same `true` override —
**required**: desktop's `@app` alias has no saas layer, and desktop
already gates policies on `POLICIES_ENABLED && useConfirmedSaaSMode()`,
so without a `true` here that runtime gate could never be satisfied.
Behaviour unchanged: desktop shows policies only when connected to SaaS.
- `PoliciesSidebar.test` mocks the flag on (it tests the component, not
the build gate — same pattern the existing `usePolicyAutoRun.retry.test`
uses).

## Backend (`@Profile("saas")` gate)

The saas backend runs under the `saas` Spring profile (as
`EntitlementGuard`, the AI controllers, etc. already do). The policy
beans are now `@Profile("saas")`, so `/api/v1/policies/*` and the
auto-run triggers exist **only** in the saas backend:

`PolicyController`, `PolicyEngine`, `PolicyRunner`, `PolicyRunRegistry`,
`PolicyValidator`, `JpaPolicyStore`, `FolderInputSource`,
`FolderOutputSink`, `InlineOutputSink`, `PolicyAccessGuard`,
`FolderAccessGuard`, `FolderWatchTrigger`, `ScheduleTrigger`,
`PolicyTriggerManager`.

**Deliberately *not* gated:** `PolicyExecutor` — `AiWorkflowService`
(always-on) injects it to run ad-hoc pipelines, so it stays
profile-free. It only depends on shared infra (`InternalApiClient`,
`ToolMetadataService`, `TempFileManager`, `ObjectMapper`), so leaving it
on is safe. Gating the engine/store/triggers as a set keeps wiring
consistent (nothing un-gated depends on a gated bean).

The saas `PolicyManagementAuthority` impl
(`TeamLeaderPolicyManagementAuthority`, `@Profile("saas")`) satisfies
`PolicyAccessGuard` in the saas context.
`AdminPolicyManagementAuthority` (`@Profile("!saas")`) becomes an unused
orphan in non-saas builds — harmless; left as-is rather than expanding
this PR's scope.

## Testing
- Frontend: full suite **869 pass**; typecheck clean on
proprietary/saas/core.
- Backend: `:proprietary` compiles, spotless clean, policy tests pass,
and the proprietary (non-saas) Spring context still boots with the
policy beans gated out (verified via the MCP `@SpringBootTest`
integration tests — no missing-bean failures).

Net: SaaS web build + desktop-in-SaaS-mode get policies (UI + API);
self-hosted proprietary and core get neither the UI nor the
`/api/v1/policies` endpoints.
2026-06-18 11:05:55 +00:00
James Brunton 13af10a6d1 Redesign policy running (#6609)
# Description of Changes
Redesign policy running so the server is in charge of policy IDs and
running, to make it impossible to have the frontend miss the results.
This solves a minor bug that we currently have in policies, where if you
load a file and then refresh while the policy is running, you'll never
receive the outputted file.
2026-06-17 16:18:50 +00:00
ConnorYoh 20c88feabb refactor(saas): remove the legacy credits engine (FE + Java) (#6687)
Complete legacy-credits teardown ("Group 3"). The per-user/per-team
credit model is fully superseded by PAYG (`wallet_ledger`) — confirmed
no PAYG code references it. Authorized to also remove the `TeamCredit`
pool + its monthly reset.

## Frontend (saas)
- Deleted `saas/hooks/useCredits.ts`, `apiKeys/hooks/useCredits.ts`,
`types/credits.ts`, `apiKeys/UsageSection.tsx`.
- `UseSession.tsx`: removed credit members (`creditBalance`,
`creditSummary`, `hasSufficientCredits`, `updateCredits`,
`refreshCredits`, `fetchCredits`) + the credit types + global
credit-update callback. **Kept** `isPro`/`refreshProStatus` and the
Supabase auth subscription listener.
- `services/apiClient.ts`: removed the dead `x-credits-remaining`
handler + low-credit plumbing (token-refresh / PAYG / 401 logic
untouched).
- Credit refs removed from `ApiKeys.tsx`, `AppConfigModal.tsx`,
`auth/teamSession.ts`.

## Java (:saas)
**Deleted (15):** `UserCredit`(+repo),
`TeamCredit`(+repo)+`TeamCreditService`, `CreditService`,
`CreditHeaderUtils`, `CreditResetScheduler`, `CreditController`,
`CreditInterceptorConfig`, `UnifiedCreditInterceptor`,
`CreditSuccessAdvice`, `CreditErrorAdvice`, `CreditConsumptionResult` (+
the CreditController test).

**Edited — stripped legacy credit side-effects, preserved
auth/role/AI/PAYG logic:**
- `AiCreate`/`AiProxyController`: dropped the
`X-Credits-Remaining`/`X-Credit-Source` response header (its only
consumer, the desktop credit system, was already removed).
- `SaasTeamService`: dropped UserCredit/TeamCredit init on team-create +
seat-update.
- `SupabaseAuthenticationFilter` / `SupabaseSecurityConfig`: dropped
`getOrCreateUserCredits` on signup + the credit field/CORS header.
- `UserRoleService`: dropped `resetCycleAllocationForRoleChange`;
`ROLE_PRO_USER` grant/revoke preserved.
- proprietary `UserRepository`: dropped
`findUsersWithApiKeyButNoCredits()`.
- Tests updated to drop credit mocks/refs.

## Kept / scope
- `isPro` / `is_pro` RPC / `ROLE_PRO_USER` (that's the separate Group-4
/ EE effort) and **all PAYG** are untouched.
- **No DB tables dropped.** `user_credits`/`team_credits` stay until a
later **gated** migration — which this PR unblocks (the JPA entities
that pinned them are gone).

## Verify
`:saas:compileJava` + `:saas:compileTestJava` pass; FE `tsc --noEmit`
(saas) + eslint clean; 0 stray artifacts; no residual source refs to the
deleted classes.

## Follow-up (not in this PR)
`ErrorTrackingService` (+
`UserErrorTracker`/`ProcessingErrorType`/`CreditsProperties`) is now a
dead island — its only callers were the deleted interceptors. Safe to
delete, but it cascades beyond the credit scope, so it's a separate
tidy-up.

Targets `feat/desktop-cloud-saas-reuse`.
2026-06-17 14:11:06 +00:00
Anthony Stirling df9dbc5179 MCP token rejection reason and stop logging the raw tokens (#6700)
- Surface the real reason an MCP token is rejected: the 401's
WWW-Authenticate header now includes error_description
(audience/issuer/expiry), and a present-but-rejected token logs the
concrete OAuth2 reason. Tokenless 401s (the normal discovery handshake)
stay at debug.
- Add McpConfigValidator that sanity-checks MCP config at startup and
logs actionable warnings (missing issuer-uri/resource-id, unrecognized
auth mode, sub + require-existing-account, open access, scopes,
allow/block overlap) so misconfig shows up in the logs before a client
ever connects.
- Align the audience-rejection message to mention both resource-id and
accepted-audiences.
- Harden audit writes: hash JWT-shaped or over-long principals
(token:<sha256-prefix>) so the insert fits the column and never stores a
raw bearer token, and stop logging the raw principal on persist failure.
---

## Checklist

### General

- [ ] I have read the [Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to
Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings

### Documentation

- [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc
repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/)
(if functionality has heavily changed)
- [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation
Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags)
(for new translation tags only)

### Translations (if applicable)

- [ ] I ran
[`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md)

### UI Changes (if applicable)

- [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached
(e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR)

### Testing (if applicable)

- [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests
pass
- [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing)
for more details.
2026-06-17 11:06:05 +00:00
Anthony Stirling de9242c4f7 Add JUnit tests for saas module coverage (#6699)
# Description of Changes

<!--
Please provide a summary of the changes, including:

- What was changed
- Why the change was made
- Any challenges encountered

Closes #(issue_number)
-->

---

## Checklist

### General

- [ ] I have read the [Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to
Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings

### Documentation

- [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc
repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/)
(if functionality has heavily changed)
- [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation
Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags)
(for new translation tags only)

### Translations (if applicable)

- [ ] I ran
[`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md)

### UI Changes (if applicable)

- [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached
(e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR)

### Testing (if applicable)

- [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests
pass
- [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing)
for more details.
2026-06-17 11:04:53 +00:00
Anthony Stirling 460c037bbb Prefer JBoss mirror over shibboleth repo for opensaml (#6701)
# Description of Changes

Jboss not shibboleth first

---

## Checklist

### General

- [ ] I have read the [Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to
Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings

### Documentation

- [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc
repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/)
(if functionality has heavily changed)
- [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation
Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags)
(for new translation tags only)

### Translations (if applicable)

- [ ] I ran
[`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md)

### UI Changes (if applicable)

- [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached
(e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR)

### Testing (if applicable)

- [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests
pass
- [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing)
for more details.
2026-06-17 10:55:59 +00:00
ConnorYohandJames Brunton cd7264a76a refactor(fe): share the SaaS PAYG experience with desktop via a cloud/ layer (#6649)
Co-authored-by: James Brunton <jbrunton96@gmail.com>
2026-06-17 11:12:05 +01:00
Reece Browne f127d4f575 fix(policies): poll runs to completion with progress, soft-retry when queue is full (#6690)
## What & why

Production reports of policy enforcement "hanging" traced to
large/many-page documents: the watermark step's flatten-to-image
(`convertPDFToImage`) on a 500+ page PDF takes minutes, exceeding both
the client poll cap and the backend per-step timeout. This makes the
slow case graceful instead of looking broken, and makes load-shedding
non-fatal.

### Poll runs to completion (no false "hang")
The client poll loop used a flat ~150s cap that was **shorter than the
backend's 300s per-step timeout**, so it abandoned long-but-healthy runs
mid-flight. The budget is now sized to the backend's real worst case —
`stepCount × per-step timeout + grace`, learned from the first status
report — so the client always polls long enough to surface the run's
**actual** terminal state (success or the backend's real error) rather
than a misleading client-side timeout.

### Per-step progress
The activity feed now shows `Enforcing… · step n/m` (from
`currentStep`/`stepCount`), so a slow step shows movement instead of a
dead spinner.

### Soft-retry on queue rejection
Under load the shared `JobQueue` rejects runs ("queue full"), which
previously surfaced as a hard failure needing a manual Retry. The
backend now tags that rejection with a stable `POLICY_QUEUE_FULL`
errorCode; the client treats it as transient backpressure and
**auto-retries the file in place** with exponential backoff (≈4s→64s, ~2
min), shown as a soft "Busy — retrying…" row, falling back to the manual
Retry only once the retry budget is spent.

## Testing
- **Frontend unit tests** (30 pass across the policies suite), including
a new `usePolicyAutoRun.retry.test.tsx` that drives the real controller
orchestration (poll → `POLICY_QUEUE_FULL` → relabel → backoff → in-place
re-dispatch), plus poll-budget, step-progress, and activity-feed relabel
cases.
- **Backend** `PolicyEngineTest` case asserting a queue-rejected run
carries the `POLICY_QUEUE_FULL` code.
- Typecheck clean on all three flavors (proprietary/saas/core); prettier
+ spotless clean.
- Poll-budget + progress + real-error surfacing were also verified live
end-to-end against a 599-page run (survived past the old cap, showed
step progress, reported the backend's real 300s-timeout failure,
recovered after a simulated network drop).

## Not included (follow-ups)
- The underlying flatten-to-image cost itself (bounded-memory/streaming
flatten, revisiting `convertPDFToImage` default and the 300s timeout) —
the real perf fix, deliberately out of scope here.
2026-06-16 17:32:12 +00:00
Anthony Stirling f33f4f8f75 Add JUnit tests for common and core module coverage (#6675)
# Description of Changes

JUNITS!
They JUnits were 100% AI generated however no code was touched

---

## Checklist

### General

- [ ] I have read the [Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to
Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings

### Documentation

- [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc
repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/)
(if functionality has heavily changed)
- [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation
Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags)
(for new translation tags only)

### Translations (if applicable)

- [ ] I ran
[`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md)

### UI Changes (if applicable)

- [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached
(e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR)

### Testing (if applicable)

- [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests
pass
- [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing)
for more details.
2026-06-16 16:23:34 +00:00
James Brunton 9a883be697 Cleanup of SaaS code (#6669)
# Description of Changes
De-AI comments and fix ridiculously indented code
2026-06-16 11:49:13 +01:00
James Brunton 42c1cce56d Fix Java formatting 2026-06-15 15:05:26 +01:00
fb6a118be9 Update SaaS to latest main (#6667)
# Description of Changes
> [!warning]
> **Do not** squash this on merge. It should be merged via a merge
commit

Fixes conflicts in `pgvector_store.py`. 

Also since codespell is failing, add comments to ignore the errors in
`sync_en_us_spelling.py`

---------

Co-authored-by: Ludy <Ludy87@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Anthony Stirling <77850077+Frooodle@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-15 14:53:22 +01:00
James Brunton 04d68c650a Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into saas-update
# Conflicts:
#	engine/src/stirling/documents/pgvector_store.py
2026-06-15 14:10:21 +01:00
Anthony Stirling 9d7467cf90 Scope signing user picker to team for multi-tenant SaaS (#6583) 2026-06-15 13:44:34 +01:00
James Brunton c1a637d764 Fix CI errors in SaaS (#6662)
# Description of Changes
Fix CI errors in #6578 to make SaaS branch ready for merge into main
2026-06-15 11:26:29 +01:00
Ludy 1ce765ab1e refactor: replace legacy Paths usage with Path.of (#6441) 2026-06-14 15:48:28 +01:00
Reece Browne f5e697347b Policies: drop the Pro-license gate from the policy API (#6645)
`PolicyController` was annotated `@PremiumEndpoint` (requires a
Pro-or-higher server license). Policies don't need a server-license
gate:

- On SaaS the server runs in Pro mode, so the check is always satisfied
anyway — it gates nothing in practice.
- Access is already governed by team scoping (#6632) plus the per-user /
guest gates.

So the annotation is dead weight and misleading. This removes it (and
its import) — a 2-line change.

## Verification
- `:proprietary:compileJava` succeeds; spotless clean. No other premium
gate on policy classes.
2026-06-12 13:13:01 +01:00
ConnorYoh 87723d3ce2 fix(payg): fire the usage-limit modal when an AI agent run hits the limit (#6638)
## Problem

We're getting 402s when an AI **agent** (chat) run hits the free
allowance / spending cap, but the frontend handles them poorly and never
pops the usage-limit modal.

The agent runs its tool calls **server-side** (loopback HTTP via
`PolicyExecutor`), so the 402 never reaches the `apiClient` interceptor
that pops the modal for direct calls. It was caught by the generic
tool-failure handler and flattened into a `CANNOT_CONTINUE` reason
string (`"The /api/v1/… tool failed: 402…"`), streamed as a `result`
event, and rendered as a scary chat bubble. This is the same gap the
policy auto-run path bridges (#6626) — one layer up.

## Fix

**Backend** (`proprietary`)
- `AiWorkflowResponse` gains `errorCode` + `errorSubscribed`.
- `AiWorkflowService` detects a downstream 401/402 entitlement sentinel
in its three tool-exec catch sites (`onToolCall`, `runPlan`,
`onConvertMarkdown`) and surfaces the structured code (+ `subscribed`)
on the terminal response instead of the raw failure text.
- Factored the 401/402 body extraction `PolicyEngine` already had into a
shared `DownstreamEntitlementError` util so the two server-side paths
can't drift.

**Frontend**
- New `usageLimitBridge` (`PAYG_LIMIT_REACHED_EVENT` +
`dispatchPaygLimitReached`) generalises the previously policy-only
bridge. Proprietary can't import the saas modal API (layering), so
server-side limit hits broadcast a window event the saas
`UsageLimitModalHost` opens the modal from. Migrated the policy path
onto it.
- `ChatContext` fires the matching modal (free → subscribe, subscribed →
raise cap) on the limit result **and** on a direct 402, replacing the
raw reason with a brief friendly line
(`chat.responses.usage_limit_reached`).

No Python engine changes — the charge/402 happens on the Java tool
endpoint that Java itself calls.

## Test plan

- [x] `:proprietary:compileJava` + `spotlessCheck` clean
- [x] `AiWorkflowServiceTest` + `PolicyEngineTest` green
- [x] eslint, proprietary + saas typechecks clean
- [ ] Manual: drive an agent run over the limit → brief line in chat +
the right modal (free vs cap)

> Note: proprietary test compilation is currently blocked on the
pre-existing `InitialSecuritySetupTest` 6-arg ctor break (unrelated,
tracked separately); verified locally by temporarily patching it.
2026-06-12 11:38:07 +01:00
James Brunton d363a1e957 Improve search logic (#6637)
# Description of Changes
Search has got significantly worse since #6581, where I added all the
missing tags for tools that should have been there for months. Turns out
that the fuzzy matching search logic has always been way too permissive
to match words with Levenshtein distances way too far away from the
target word, so long searches include way too much stuff. The new tags
just exposed that underlying logic issue. This PR makes the Levenshtein
logic much stricter, so it is still tolerant to minor typos in tool
names, but doesn't match completely inappropriate strings.
2026-06-12 10:34:11 +01:00
James Brunton d995471a55 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into SaaS-update
# Conflicts:
#	frontend/editor/src/proprietary/components/chat/ChatContext.tsx
#	frontend/editor/src/saas/components/shared/TrialStatusBanner.tsx
2026-06-12 09:58:40 +01:00
Reece Browne e88d22d2fc Policies: scope to the owning team; editing restricted to team leaders (#6632) 2026-06-11 23:21:48 +01:00
Anthony Stirling ddf10f0aaf Stop advertising mcp.tools scopes in OAuth metadata when scope enforcement is disabled 2026-06-11 23:03:43 +01:00
ConnorYoh 22379fd5ab fe(payg): show the usage-limit modal when the limit is hit (direct + policy) (#6626) 2026-06-11 21:28:44 +01:00
Reece BrowneandClaude Opus 4.8 ef65e6b015 feat(policies): org-wide policies with admin-only editing (#6625)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 21:23:06 +01:00
Anthony Stirling 47e5977a31 Drop startup credit-reset catch-up (bulk per-user loop; lazy reset covers it) 2026-06-11 21:21:28 +01:00
Anthony Stirling 3a4b340313 Remove legacy CreditBackfillRunner (PAYG replaces it; rows created lazily) 2026-06-11 21:03:09 +01:00
ConnorYoh ee9fdeed6b fix(payg): run the entitlement guard before the charge interceptor (#6622)
## Problem

When the `EntitlementGuard` refuses a request with **402** (team is over
its free allowance / spending cap, or has no subscription to bill), the
handler never runs — so it must not charge. But it did: the guard (order
**1100**) ran *after* the charge interceptor (**1000**), so
`openProcess` had already written the charge before the 402, and
`afterCompletion` then billed it as "customer paid for the attempt" — a
ledger debit, and a **Stripe meter for a subscribed-over-cap team**.

## Fix

**Run the guard first** (order **900**, before the charge interceptor at
1000). Spring runs interceptors in ascending order on the way in and
**skips a later interceptor's `preHandle` (and `afterCompletion`)
entirely once an earlier one returns `false`** — so a refused request
short-circuits with its 402 *before* the charge interceptor runs at all.
A blocked request never opens a process, materialises inputs, or writes
a charge.

This replaces the earlier attribute-flag + `afterCompletion`-refund
approach with a simpler reorder (per review): the no-charge-on-block
guarantee is now **structural**, and it also avoids the wasted
open-then-refund churn (no temp-file write, no debit/refund pair) for
refused requests.

### Why the reorder is safe
- `EntitlementGuard` reads no `PaygChargeInterceptor` state and has **no
`afterCompletion`** (only `preHandle`), so reverse-order teardown is a
non-issue.
- The legacy `UnifiedCreditInterceptor` (default order **0**, and only
registered under the `legacy-credits` profile) still runs first, so any
legacy rejection wins.
- For *admitted* requests both interceptors still run (guard then
charge) — behaviour is unchanged; only refused requests now
short-circuit before the charge.

## Tests

`PaygWebMvcConfigTest` locks the `ENTITLEMENT_GUARD_ORDER <
INTERCEPTOR_ORDER` invariant (if it's ever reversed, refused requests
would bill again — this fails first). Existing `EntitlementGuardTest`
already proves the guard returns 402 on a degraded/billable request.
`:saas:test` + spotless green.

## Related (separate, in progress)

The **fail-cleanly + fire-the-modal** half (suppress the error toast,
trigger the subscribe/raise-cap modal via the existing
`subscribed`/`category` signal — catching the 402 centrally so direct
API usage is handled, and propagating the entitlement reason through the
async policy-run status) lands **with Ethan's modal** so we don't remove
the toast before there's a popup to replace it.
2026-06-11 20:42:40 +01:00
Anthony Stirling b1a960a240 Skip self-host user-table bootstrap (team backfill, grandfathering) in SaaS 2026-06-11 20:39:48 +01:00
Anthony Stirling 946c032fb5 Change default language to en-US and add US language (#6621) 2026-06-11 20:36:23 +01:00
ConnorYoh 37b4d24a95 fix(payg): gate + charge AI document tools and AI Create sessions (#6617)
## Problem

Two AI surfaces slipped through PAYG unbilled:

1. **AI document tools** — `/api/v1/ai/tools/**`
(`PdfCommentAgentController`, `MathAuditorAgentController`) live in the
**proprietary** module, which can't depend on `saas` and so can't carry
the saas-only `@RequiresFeature`. They also lacked
`@AutoJobPostMapping`, so the charge interceptor's scope gate
short-circuited them **before** category resolution: **not charged, and
not even entitlement-gated** — whether called directly or dispatched by
the orchestrator.
2. **AI Create** — `/api/v1/ai/create` is JSON/session-based with no
file input, so the multipart charge path never fired. The old
per-generation charge ran through the now-dead legacy credit system, so
it currently charges nothing.

## Fix

- **`AiToolRoutes`** (new, saas) — single source of truth for the
`/api/v1/ai/tools/**` prefix. The proprietary controllers stay
untouched; the saas hot-path recognises them by path:
- **`PaygChargeInterceptor`**: brings these routes into scope and bills
them **AI** on a direct call. An orchestrator-dispatched call still
resolves to **AUTOMATION** first (the `X-Stirling-Automation` header is
checked before the path rule), so AI-tool-inside-a-workflow keeps
billing as automation.
  - **`EntitlementGuard`**: gates them on **`AI_SUPPORT`**.
- This keeps the `proprietary → saas` layering intact (no backwards
dependency).
- **`JobChargeService.chargeStandalone(ctx, units)`** — charges a fixed
unit count for a non-file billable action, reusing the existing
free-grant split + shadow row + ledger debit + `close()`→meter path on a
standalone bookkeeping job (no lineage inputs, so nothing lineage-joins
it). **`JobService.open(ctx, docUnits)`** opens that bare job.
- **`AiCreateController.createSession`** — charges **one document per
session** at creation (best-effort; entitlement is already enforced
upstream by the class-level `@RequiresFeature(AI_SUPPORT)`). Follow-up
edits (`outline` / `reprompt` / `draft` / `template` / `stream`) carry
**no** charge — they have no charge hook, so "charge on create,
follow-ups free" falls out naturally.

Per the agreed scope: charge AI Create on create now; we can optimise
follow-up handling later. **AI workflow categorisation (AUTOMATION vs
AI) intentionally left as-is** (the orchestrator's automation header
dominates by design).

## Tests

- `PaygChargeInterceptorTest`: AI-tool route (no annotations) is in
scope + **AI** category; same route with the automation header →
**AUTOMATION**; a plain non-AI route still short-circuits.
- `EntitlementGuardTest`: AI-tool route is in scope + gated on
**AI_SUPPORT** (degraded team → 402; anonymous → 401 with `category:
AI`).
- `JobChargeServiceTest`: `chargeStandalone` charges + meters the paid
portion for a subscribed team, draws the free grant (no meter) for an
unsubscribed team, and rejects `BYPASSED`.

`:saas:test` + `:saas:spotlessCheck` green; coverage gates met.

## Follow-ups (not in this PR)

- Make AI Create follow-ups explicitly cheaper / chained if we want
(currently free by absence of a hook).
- Decide whether AI-tool-inside-a-workflow should bill as AI rather than
AUTOMATION.
2026-06-11 20:10:44 +01:00
ConnorYoh aaa2599e23 fix(saas): block accepting an invite when it would orphan a paid team (#6616)
## Problem

A **free team can invite a paid team's leader** to join. The leader
accepts, and:
- `acceptInvitation` moves them onto the inviting team and removes their
membership from the old team, but only deletes the old team if it's
**personal**.
- Their paid (non-personal) team is left **memberless but still
subscribed** — an orphaned Stripe subscription billing for a team nobody
is in.

## Root cause

Two gaps in `SaasTeamService.acceptInvitation`:

1. The pre-accept guard checks `hasPaidSubscription(acceptingUser)` →
`existsActivePaidSubscriptionForUser(supabaseId)`, keyed on
**`user_id`**. A team's plan is keyed on **`team_id`**
(`existsActiveSubscriptionForTeam`), so a paid team's *leader* isn't
caught and accepts freely.
2. The 'leave existing teams' loop deletes the membership directly and
only marks **personal** teams for deletion — it bypasses the last-leader
protection `leaveTeam` already enforces (`"Cannot leave as the last team
leader. Transfer leadership first."`), and never cleans up / cancels the
non-personal team.

There is no in-app subscription-cancel path (cancellation is
Stripe-portal/webhook driven), so nothing reconciles the orphan after
the fact — it has to be prevented.

## Fix

Add `assertCanLeaveCurrentTeamsToJoinAnother(user)`, called in
`acceptInvitation` before any membership changes. For each non-personal
team where the user is the **last leader**, the accept is rejected:
- team has an active subscription → *"Cancel the plan or transfer
leadership before joining another team."*
- otherwise → *"Transfer leadership before joining another team."*

This mirrors the protection `leaveTeam` already has and is
team/leadership-aware, closing the `user_id`-vs-`team_id` gap. Regular
members and teams with another leader are unaffected.

## Verification

- `ENABLE_SAAS=true ./gradlew :saas:compileJava` — passes.
- Manual: with a paid team leader, accepting an invite to another team
should now be rejected with the message above; verify a non-leader
member can still accept.

## Note

This prevents *new* orphans. Any teams already orphaned by this bug
(memberless, still subscribed) would need a one-off reconciliation —
happy to follow up with a query/cleanup if useful.
2026-06-11 20:10:21 +01:00
Anthony Stirling 1d598d5caa MCP OAuth discovery fix + Supabase consent page (#6608) 2026-06-11 18:30:49 +01:00
ConnorYoh 9e5fe2f4ca fix(payg): attribute policy runs to the owner so usage is charged (#6620)
## Problem

A policy ran over a file but the owner's **free usage was never
consumed**.

A policy run executes on a **background virtual thread**
(`PolicyEngine.submit` → `asyncExecutor`), and Spring's
`SecurityContextHolder` is thread-local — so the worker thread has no
identity. When `PolicyExecutor` → `InternalApiClient.post` resolves the
tool-call API key via `UserService.getCurrentUsername()`, it finds
nothing and falls back to the **`INTERNAL_API_USER`** key. The loopback
tool calls then authenticate as that system account, so
`PaygChargeInterceptor` attributes the charge to *its* team (or none) —
the real owner's free grant is untouched. Folder-watch / scheduled
triggers are even further removed (fired from a background watch loop
with no request context at all).

The charging *mechanism* was fine (AUTOMATION, multipart,
`openProcess`); only the **attribution** was wrong.

## Fix

Propagate the acting identity onto the worker thread using the
**audit-principal MDC key** that `UserService.getCurrentUsername()`
already reads as its documented async fallback (the same mechanism used
for other async jobs). No new plumbing through the executor.

- **`runPolicy`** (stored policies — covers triggers *and* manual
`runWith`) → bill the **policy owner**. `Policy.owner` is the username
stamped at creation, so `getApiKeyForUser(owner)` resolves it.
- **`submit`** (ad-hoc Automate/AI one-offs) → bill the **submitting
user**, captured on the request thread (it doesn't survive the hop to
the worker otherwise).

With the principal set, `InternalApiClient` dispatches each tool call as
that user → the interceptor resolves the right team → free grant draws /
Stripe meters correctly.

## Tests

`PolicyEngineTest`:
- `runPolicyDispatchesToolCallsAsTheOwner` — asserts MDC
`auditPrincipal` == the policy owner at the moment
`InternalApiClient.post` is invoked.
- `adHocRunDispatchesToolCallsAsTheSubmittingUser` — asserts it's the
submitting user for an ad-hoc run.

`:proprietary:test` + `:saas:test` + spotless green; coverage gates met.

## Heads-up (not in this PR)

Once attributed, **automatic folder-watch / scheduled runs consume free
grant (or bill) per file** — set up once, runs forever. That's
automation-is-billable working as intended, but a set-and-forget policy
can drain an allowance fast, so it may warrant a per-policy cap or a
heads-up in the UI. Flagging for a product decision.
2026-06-11 18:28:58 +01:00
ConnorYoh 5bc7ae626d fix(payg): cancelled subscription left team gated as subscribed (#6611)
## Problem

A team that **cancelled** its PAYG subscription kept full subscribed
access:

- **UI didn't reflect cancellation** — the Plan tab still rendered the
subscribed view, never the free/upgrade view.
- **Automation wasn't stopped** — automation / AI / API kept running
without ever falling back to the free-grant gate.

## Root cause

`TeamBillingService.compute` decided `subscribed` as:

```java
boolean subscribed =
    subscriptionId != null
        || extOpt.map(PaygTeamExtensions::getStripeCustomerId).filter(s -> !s.isBlank()).isPresent();
```

On cancellation, the `customer.subscription.deleted` webhook calls
`payg_unlink_subscription`, which nulls `payg_subscription_id` but
**deliberately keeps `stripe_customer_id`** (so a future re-subscribe
can reuse the Stripe customer).

`payg_link_subscription` is the **only** writer of
`payg_team_extensions.stripe_customer_id`, and it writes it in the
*same* `UPDATE` as `payg_subscription_id` (on
`customer.subscription.created`). So the customer id is never set before
the subscription id — the "pre-webhook stand-in" the old comment claimed
**cannot happen**. The fallback only ever pinned a team that *ever*
subscribed to `subscribed` forever, because the Stripe customer outlives
the subscription.

Both symptoms are this one flag:
- `PaygWalletController` status → `SUBSCRIBED` vs `FREE`
- `EntitlementService` gate branch → monthly-cap vs free-grant

## Fix

Gate `subscribed` purely on `payg_subscription_id != null`. A cancelled
team now correctly drops to free (UI shows free; billable ops gate on
the one-time grant). This aligns the wallet/entitlement read with the
**meter path** (`JobChargeService.close`), which already gated on
`payg_subscription_id`.

Handles both Stripe cancel modes: "cancel at period end" keeps the sub
`active` (id stays set) until `.deleted` fires at period end → access
through the paid period; immediate cancel fires `.deleted` now → flips
to free now.

**No data migration / backfill** — already-cancelled teams have
`payg_subscription_id = NULL`, so they flip to free as soon as this
ships (within the 30s billing-cache TTL).

## Tests

Adds `TeamBillingServiceTest` — the `subscribed` computation previously
had **no** unit coverage (which is how this shipped). Covers: subscribed
iff subscription id present; **cancelled team (customer id remains,
subscription id null) ≠ subscribed** + free grant survives;
no-subscription/no-customer; no extension row.

`:saas:test` + `:saas:spotlessCheck` green; coverage gates met.

## Not included (optional hardening, can fast-follow)

- Cross-check the synced `stripe.subscriptions.status` to guard a
*missed* `.deleted` webhook leaving `payg_subscription_id` stale.
- Push cache-invalidation from the webhook (currently ≤30s TTL
staleness).
2026-06-11 17:26:58 +01:00
ConnorYohandReece cf513c255b PAYG: pay-as-you-go billing — metered automation/AI/API + one-time free grant (#6589)
## Summary

Pay-as-you-go (PAYG) billing for Stirling-PDF SaaS. Manual PDF editing
stays free forever; only **automation, AI, and API** usage is metered.
Every team gets a **one-time lifetime free grant** (default 500 PDFs)
before any billing; past that, a team adds a card and pays per metered
document, with a self-set monthly spending cap.

This branch combines and supersedes the in-flight BE (#6574) and FE
(#6579) work plus the SaaS edge functions (Stirling-PDF-SaaS PR, now on
`v3`), hardened into a single reviewable feature after a pre-merge
dead-code/security review.

## Billing model

- **Always free:** manual / JWT web-tool usage is `BYPASSED` — never
metered, no matter where it's triggered.
- **Billable categories:** `AUTOMATION`, `AI`, `API`.
- **One-time lifetime free grant** (`pricing_policy.free_tier_units`,
default 500): never resets, survives subscribing. It gates unsubscribed
teams (billable API calls hard-stop with a 402 once exhausted) and
decides the free-vs-paid split of every job.
- **Subscribed:** paid documents (beyond the grant) are metered to a
Stripe Billing Meter; an optional monthly spending cap degrades billable
categories when reached.
- **Dedup:** the same file pushed through several steps within a
workflow window counts **once** (lineage join), so API/AI chaining on
one file isn't double-charged.

## What's included

**Database** — Flyway migrations `V11`→`V21` with matching Supabase
twins: pricing policy + per-team sidecar (`payg_team_extensions`:
subscription id, Stripe customer, free-grant counter), append-only
`wallet_ledger`, shadow charges, subscription-state RPCs (`V14`), audit
logs (`V15`), billing category (`V16`), one-time lifetime free grant
(`V19`), launch-grant seed (`V20`), drop of the unused
`wallet_category_summary` view (`V21`).

**Charge pipeline** — `PaygChargeInterceptor` (open/join a process,
split the free grant, write the ledger DEBIT), `JobChargeService`
(consume the grant under a row lock, restore it on a first-step refund,
meter only the paid portion on completion), `StaleJobCloser` fallback
(idempotent close → meter).

**Entitlement** — `EntitlementService` (per-team cached snapshot:
grant-gated for free teams, monthly-cap-gated for subscribed) +
`EntitlementGuard` (401 `SIGNUP_REQUIRED` / 402 `FEATURE_DEGRADED` /
`PAYG_LIMIT_REACHED`).

**Metering** — `PaygMeterReportingService` writes a durable
`payg_meter_event_log` row around every POST to the `meter-payg-units`
edge fn (pending → posted/failed); `PaygMeterReconcileScheduler` retries
unposted events under the same idempotency key inside Stripe's 24h dedup
window.

**Billing facts** — `TeamBillingService` reads the synced `stripe.*`
mirror (subscription window, per-document rate; the unsubscribed-team
estimate resolves the rate by Price `lookup_key = plan:processor`).

**Wallet API** — `PaygWalletController`: `GET /api/v1/payg/wallet`,
`PATCH /api/v1/payg/cap`.

**Frontend** — PAYG Plan page (two-card free layout + subscribed views),
`useWallet`, upgrade modal with lazy-loaded Stripe Embedded Checkout and
a shared `SpendCapControl`, customer-portal link, 402/401 interceptor
toast, en-GB i18n. (Per-member usage shows each teammate's spend; the
activity feed is behind a flag until polished.)

**SaaS edge functions** (`Stirling-PDF-SaaS` `v3`) —
`create-checkout-session`, `create-payg-team-subscription`,
`create-customer-portal-session`, `meter-payg-units`,
`payg-subscription-webhook`, `stripe-sync`, plus the stripe-sync
`migrate` + scoped-`backfill` scripts. All price lookup is DB-driven (no
`STRIPE_PAYG_PRICE_ID_*` env vars).

## Release prerequisites (prod)

1. Apply Flyway migrations (`V11`→`V21`) and the Supabase migration
twins.
2. Stripe Sync Engine: run `stripe-sync:migrate`, then a **scoped**
backfill — `product`, `price`, `customer`, `subscription` only (not
`all`, which rate-limits).
3. Register 2 PAYG webhook endpoints (each its own signing secret):
`stripe-sync` (product/price/customer/subscription `.*`) and
`payg-subscription-webhook` (`customer.subscription.created`/`.deleted`
drive state; `.updated` + `invoice.*` observed). Keep the legacy
`stripe-webhook` only if credits/self-hosted flows still run.
4. Stripe Billing Meter: `event_name = payg_doc_units`, value key
`processed_documents`.
5. Env: `PAYG_METER_ENDPOINT` + `SUPABASE_EDGE_FUNCTION_SECRET`
(backend); the webhook signing secrets (edge fns). The default pricing
policy must point at the PAYG Stripe Price(s); `V20` seeds
`free_tier_units = 500`.

## Testing

- `:saas:test` green, `:saas:spotlessCheck` clean, edge-fn Deno tests
green, FE saas typecheck clean (the remaining errors are pre-existing
`proprietary/*` + `prototypes/*`, untouched here). Cucumber shadow-mode
suite + CI workflow included.

## Pre-merge review

An independent dead-code/security pass came back **clean on security**
(team-derived authz / no IDOR, leader-only cap mutation, no
billing-category downgrade, dev/mock hooks gated to
`import.meta.env.DEV` + `/dev/`, no secrets/injection, fail-open
metering by design). The dead/unwired code it flagged has been removed
in this branch (unenforced sub-cap control, an unused JDBC DAO + its
view, dead methods).

## Follow-ups (tracked, not blocking)

- **Enforce per-member sub-caps** — the control was removed because it
read for display but never gated a request; the per-member usage display
and `cap_units` column are retained for when enforcement is wired.
- **API/AI chaining billing model + `ProcessType` enum** — confirm
same-file dedup covers API chaining; define per-tool AI charging; decide
whether the unused enum values stay.
- **Activity feed** — hidden behind a flag until the meter-event surface
is polished.

---------

Co-authored-by: Reece <reece@stirlingpdf.com>
2026-06-11 15:56:01 +01:00
EthanHealy01andAnthony Stirling 88adb7adad create agent (#6520)
Added the create agent. Use [these
prompts](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF-SaaS/blob/main/docgen/backend/default_templates/sample_prompts.md)
to test or try your own :)

Here’s the one I use

```
Hey, I need to generate an employee expense report for reimbursement.
Company: Summit Consulting Partners Company address: 88 Riverside Plaza, Suite 1400, New York, NY 10069 Accounting department email: expenses@example.com
Employee details:
* Employee Name: Michael Tran
* Employee ID: EMP-1047
* Department: Client Services
* Report Date: January 20th, 2026
* Reporting Period: January 5th, 2026 – January 16th, 2026
* Manager Approver: Laura Simmons
Trip purpose: Client onsite meetings with Atlantic Energy Solutions in Boston, MA.
Expense items:
* Flight (NYC to Boston roundtrip) — $325.40 — January 5th, 2026 — Airline ticket
* Hotel (3 nights at Harborview Hotel) — $822.75 — January 5th-8th, 2026
* Taxi from airport to hotel — $48.00 — January 5th, 2026
* Client dinner (3 attendees) — $186.20 — January 6th, 2026
* Parking at JFK Airport — $72.00 — January 5th-8th, 2026
* Breakfast (per diem not used) — $18.50 — January 7th, 2026
* Uber to client office — $22.10 — January 7th, 2026
* Printing + presentation materials — $46.90 — January 8th, 2026
* Lunch with client — $39.75 — January 8th, 2026
* Office supplies (notebooks, pens) — $27.60 — January 10th, 2026
* Mileage reimbursement (client visit in NJ, 42 miles @ $0.67/mile) — $28.14 — January 14th, 2026
* Team lunch meeting (internal) — $64.30 — January 15th, 2026
Reimbursement method should be direct deposit.
Add a notes section stating: "All receipts attached. Expenses are business-related and comply with company travel policy."
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Anthony Stirling <77850077+frooodle@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-11 14:18:13 +00:00
James Brunton 68e031ac55 Policies tidying (#6587)
# Description of Changes
* Improve typing of API (breaking change but unreleased, frontend also
updated in this PR)
* Add ownership concept to policies
* De-AI the comments
* Update the `task dev:saas` rule to spawn the engine as well
2026-06-11 13:20:01 +01:00
Anthony Stirling 9a1804ce04 Merge branch 'main' into SaaS 2026-06-10 14:58:44 +01:00
EthanHealy01 5fca2f199a Feature/pdf ingestion jpdfium (#6525) 2026-06-10 14:51:41 +01:00
Anthony Stirling 90bda6b4b4 fix: User principal was discarded by the resource server re-authentication
The saas chain authenticates bearer requests twice:
SupabaseAuthenticationFilter builds an EnhancedJwtAuthenticationToken
with the resolved User principal, but BearerTokenAuthenticationFilter
(oauth2ResourceServer) then re-authenticates the same token through the
static toAuthentication converter and overwrites the SecurityContext
with a token whose principal is the raw Jwt - so storage endpoints kept
returning 401 "Unsupported user principal" despite the principal fix.

Carry the User across in the converter: when the context already holds
an EnhancedJwtAuthenticationToken for the same subject with a User
principal, attach that User to the converter-built token. No extra DB
lookups; anonymous sessions and API-key auth unchanged. Covered by new
unit tests (carry, no-context, subject mismatch).
2026-06-10 14:37:12 +01:00
Anthony Stirling 5b412c0fed cleanup: trim oversized comments across recent SaaS fixes
Reduce multi-paragraph comment blocks to short two-line notes and drop
history-style references; no behaviour changes.
2026-06-10 14:30:29 +01:00
Anthony StirlingandClaude Opus 4.8 d29059e6fb fix: storage APIs 401'd valid Supabase sessions (principal type mismatch)
FileStorageService.requireAuthenticatedUser and
FolderService.requireAuthenticatedUser authorize via
'principal instanceof User', but EnhancedJwtAuthenticationToken extends
JwtAuthenticationToken whose principal is the decoded Jwt - so every
/api/v1/storage/* request 401'd for JWT users AFTER Spring Security had
already authenticated them. This persistent 401-with-valid-session was
the trigger feeding the frontend login loop.

Attach the filter-resolved local User as the token principal for full
accounts (User implements UserDetails, matching the form-login
convention every shared instanceof check expects). Anonymous sessions
keep the raw Jwt principal, preserving their existing exclusions. All
other principal consumers verified safe: AuthenticationUtils checks
instanceof User first, extractSupabaseId/CreditController/Team
SecurityExpressions switch on the authentication type, not the
principal.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-10 13:44:22 +01:00
James Brunton 3675db5907 Add new triggers, sources and sinks to policies (#6543)
# Description of Changes
Add new triggers:
- Schedule (fires every X amount of time)
- Folder watch (fires whenever the OS tells us a folder has a new file
in it; on Mac this is technically a 2s schedule but that's just how Java
implements it)

Add new sources:
- Folder (reads from this directory)

Add new sinks:
- Inline (stores in FileStorage)
- Folder (stores in specified directory)

Still want to do S3 buckets and web hooks and stuff, but they can come
in a future PR. I'm hoping this should make it sufficient to be able to
integrate with processing folders frontend etc. I've also changed it so
that policies can have multiple sources and triggers at once, which
seems like it might be useful.
2026-06-10 10:55:29 +00:00
Anthony Stirling 3ecd95b779 Add MCP server with OAuth/API-key auth (#6570)
Adds an optional MCP server (proprietary module) that exposes Stirling's
PDF operations and AI capabilities to MCP clients. Off by default, zero
footprint when disabled.

### What
- New `/mcp` endpoint: streamable-HTTP + JSON-RPC 2.0; 8 tools
(describe_operation, pages/convert/misc/security category tools, AI,
upload, download).
- Runs real operations over an internal loopback; results returned
inline as base64 (small) or by fileId (large).

### Auth (two modes)
- OAuth2 resource server: RFC 9728 protected-resource metadata, RFC 8707
audience binding, JWKS, `mcp.tools.read/write` scopes; binds each token
to a provisioned Stirling account.
- API-key mode: reuses Stirling per-user `X-API-KEY` (no IdP needed).

### Security
- Per-user file ownership in FileStorage: async/queued writes scoped to
the submitting user; legacy/owner-less files stay readable.
- Admin allow/block list controls which operations are exposed.
- Python engine gated behind a shared secret (`X-Engine-Auth`).
- MCP filter chain is isolated and cannot weaken the main app's
security.
- Hardened: no upstream error-body leakage, log injection sanitized,
fileId path/sidecar enumeration blocked.

### Config / footprint
- Disabled by default (`mcp.enabled=false`); all beans
`@ConditionalOnProperty`.
---

## Checklist

### General

- [ ] I have read the [Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to
Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings

### Documentation

- [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc
repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/)
(if functionality has heavily changed)
- [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation
Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags)
(for new translation tags only)

### Translations (if applicable)

- [ ] I ran
[`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md)

### UI Changes (if applicable)

- [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached
(e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR)

### Testing (if applicable)

- [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests
pass
- [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing)
for more details.
2026-06-10 09:46:25 +00:00