mirror of
https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF.git
synced 2026-09-03 05:10:16 +03:00
96207a7304078e3323e419581d30bc0b667795c9
82
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
4ab2505a6c |
Comment-quality standard, and the gate that enforces it (#7663)
## The problem AI PRs write comments that restate the line below them, mark sections with box drawing, and narrate the diff. Nothing in the repo said not to, and nothing checked. `AGENTS.md` had one line about comments and it was buried in the Python section. Banners and `Step N:` narration have zero occurrences in the 15 months before Aug 2025, so this is new. ## The fix A written standard, plus a linter that enforces the mechanical part of it on added lines only. - [devGuide/CODE_COMMENTS.md](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/devGuide/CODE_COMMENTS.md) holds the reasoning and worked examples; a section in [AGENTS.md](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/AGENTS.md) holds the operative rules, kept short so they stay in an agent's context. The two are split by kind rather than duplicated, because the same prose in two places drifts. - Rules in [comment-rules.mjs](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs), shared by both engines. - Two engines. `.ts` / `.tsx` / `.mjs` go to an [oxlint JS plugin](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-lint-oxlint-plugin.mjs) so comments come from the parser rather than a line scan; `.java` / `.py` go to a [line scanner](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-lint.mjs). Neither reads the other's files, so they cannot disagree about one file. - Between them they read every comment form the repo writes: `//` and `/* */`, Javadoc and JSDoc, JSX comments, `#`, and Python docstrings. - Runs in `task pre-commit`, so the git hook and the `pre_commit.yml` CI job both get it, and as a Claude Code [`Stop` hook](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-lint-hook.mjs) so an agent fixes the comment inside the turn that wrote it. ## The rules The part worth arguing about. **Every rule blocks.** A rule that only warns is a rule nobody acts on, so a finding you believe is wrong is a bug in the rule: narrow it, or mark the line and say why. | | Fires on | | --- | --- | | [CMT001](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs#L71) | Every word in the comment already appears in the code below it. Max 6 words, skipped for prose punctuation and for a bare Arrange/Act/Assert marker | | [CMT002](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs#L92) | 4+ rule or box-drawing characters, or a bare section label from [a fixed list](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs#L84) (`Types`, `Helpers`, `State`, `Handlers`, ...) | | [CMT003](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs#L110) | `Step N:` with a separator, or `Then,` / `Next,` / `Finally,`. Suppressed in test files | | [CMT004](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs#L129) | A comment about the code's own past: `this used to`, `renamed from`, `was previously called`. Suppressed in test files | | [CMT005](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs#L154) | 3+ consecutive comment lines where 2/3 [parse as code](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs#L143) | | [CMT006](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs#L31) | A run of implementation comment over 12 lines, outside the first 5 lines of a file. Doc blocks are exempt, because the standard asks for thorough contracts | | [CMT007](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs#L180) | A parameter or return description that adds no word its name lacks. Reads Javadoc/JSDoc `@param`, Sphinx `:param name:` and Google `name: description` | | [CMT008](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs#L239) | An allow directive naming a rule that does not exist, or one that silenced nothing | | [CMT009](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs#L219) | A `TODO` / `FIXME` / `HACK` naming no issue or link. An owner is not accepted: a username goes stale, an issue outlives it | Each rule carries the readings it deliberately excludes, next to the rule. Those exclusions came from running the rules over this repo, not from taste: `CMT004` does not match a bare "no longer needed" because that is as often about runtime lifecycle as about history, and `CMT003` needs a separator after the number so a wrapped line beginning "step 2 unmounts + remounts the panel" reads as the prose it is. A comment sharing a line with code is judged by the rules that do not depend on the code below it, so a trailing `// TODO fix this` or `/* this used to run before the flush */` still reports, while `50L * 1024 * 1024 // 50 MB` does not. `CMT001` would have been wrong about six in seven trailing comments here, so it stays out of them. If a finding is wrong, `// comment-lint-allow: CMT002` on the line above. Rule-specific, [no blanket disable](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs#L229). A directive naming a rule that does not exist, or silencing nothing, is itself a `CMT008` failure, so a typo cannot quietly disable a rule and a stale one gets deleted rather than accumulating. No native linter covers `CMT007`. `eslint-plugin-jsdoc`'s `require-param-description`, Checkstyle's `NonEmptyAtclauseDescription` and ruff's D-rules all check that a description exists, not whether it says anything. ## Scoping Added comment **text** only, not lines git calls new. Reindenting a file or moving a block makes git mark untouched comments as added; findings are matched against the comment text at the base, so only genuinely new content reports. The whole file is read and every comment in it evaluated. Only the *reporting* is filtered, so a rule still sees the code a comment introduces, the full run it belongs to, and the base version of the file. Existing tree is untouched. `task pre-commit:comment-lint:all` reports it and always exits 0: | | java | ts/js | py | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | findings | 1,218 | 741 | 204 | 2,163 across 542 files, mostly `CMT002` banners (1,482) and `CMT001` restatements (456). Clearing it is separate work, by directory. Not in this PR: an advisory LLM review layer for the things no pattern can judge. ## Verification Run against [#7494](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/pull/7494) as CI would, in a throwaway worktree: **two findings on a 78 file, +4,512 line change, both genuine banners, in 952ms**. A whole-file scan of those same files gives 11; the other 9 were withheld because that PR's author did not write them, and they are the `@param teamId the team ID` shape this standard exists to stop. Both scanners blank string and character literals before looking for comment markers, because a partial lex desynchronises everything after it: one apostrophe in a Java comment, or one Python template whose closing quotes start a line, is enough to read dozens of lines of code as a single comment. Two fixtures carry canaries that stop being reported if either engine ever desynchronises again. The [fixture corpus](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/tree/claude/ai-pr-comment-quality-dd970e/scripts/lint/fixtures) pins all 9 rules against both engines, and `--selftest` fails if the two disagree about the same file. ## Two things reviewers should know **The oxlint JS plugin API is alpha.** oxlint itself is stable and already this repo's frontend linter; the plugin API is the new dependency. Its documented failure mode ([oxc#25203](https://github.com/oxc-project/oxc/issues/25203)) is being skipped silently while oxlint still reports success. That affects the standalone release binary rather than the npm package this invokes, but the class of failure reads exactly like clean code, so the run asserts `number_of_rules >= 1` from oxlint's own report and a broken engine exits 2 rather than passing. If the API ever breaks, the fallback is folding these rules into the line scanner, which already implements all nine for Java and Python. **`.claude/settings.json` is now committed**, carrying the hook and nothing else: 19 lines, no `permissions`, nothing machine-specific. That partly reverts `c35546a212` ("Ignore claude dir"), which existed because this file had twice been committed by accident with a personal `permissions` allowlist, once with absolute machine paths. Personal config still belongs in `.claude/settings.local.json`, which the new pattern keeps ignored, and hook entries merge across the two so nobody's own hooks are lost. If you already hand-wrote a `.claude/settings.json`, copy it somewhere first: that path used to be git-ignored, and git overwrites an ignored file without warning when a commit starts tracking it. Across 19 local checkouts here, 13 have `settings.local.json` and none has a hand-written `settings.json`. To turn the hook off, `{ "env": { "COMMENT_LINT_HOOK": "0" } }` in local settings. Claude Code can only disable all hooks at once, hence the switch. The commit-time gate still applies. ## How to test ```bash task pre-commit:comment-lint:ci ``` The fixture corpus, then the diff. The corpus checks the rules themselves rather than the code under review, so it runs on CI and before a rule change, not on every local commit. ```bash task comment-lint:branch ``` `clean (34 files in scope)`. `task comment-lint` is the same thing scoped to uncommitted work, which is what the git hook and CI run. To watch it bite, add `// Is banner` above `export function isBanner` in `scripts/lint/comment-rules.mjs` and run `task comment-lint`: one `CMT001`, exit 1. The gate covers its own source, which is why these scripts have no section dividers. ```bash task pre-commit:comment-lint:all ``` The standing backlog, report-only. Verified on the pinned oxlint 1.77.0, not only the 1.79 the plugin was prototyped against. |
||
|
|
cbe3ef8f69 |
fix: validate frontend dependency installation (#7625)
# Description of Changes The current check only verifies the existence of the `node_modules` directory. After an incomplete or corrupted installation, this can lead to the task being incorrectly marked as complete. `npm ls --depth=0` instead checks whether the direct frontend dependencies are actually installed and consistent. This reliably detects and automatically repairs corrupted installations. --- ## Checklist ### General - [ ] I have read the [Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings ### Documentation - [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/) (if functionality has heavily changed) - [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags) (for new translation tags only) ### Translations (if applicable) - [ ] I ran [`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md) ### UI Changes (if applicable) - [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached (e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR) ### Testing (if applicable) - [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests pass - [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing) for more details. |
||
|
|
732ef18ae5 |
feat(account-link): redirect-based connect handshake for self-hosted linking (#7494)
Links a self-hosted instance to a SaaS team over an ordinary redirect, and leaves the admin's browser holding a Stirling session at the same time. ## The problem A self-hosted server needs a device credential bound to a SaaS team, and the admin's Supabase JWT must never reach the instance backend. Three things ruled out the obvious approaches: - **A customer hostname can never be in Supabase's redirect allow-list**, so the sign-in cannot happen on the instance's own origin. That is why SSO and sign-up did not work for linking at all. - **A device credential identifies a server, not a person.** Every attended portal read (Usage, Billing, Documents, Infrastructure) goes through `getPortalSaasToken()` and needs a *user* session, so a credential-only link left all of them asking for a second sign-in. - **The previous design relayed a JWT** from the browser into the instance, which is the thing we wanted to avoid. That path is deleted here. ## The solution Redirect and nonce, modelled on desktop's `authService.loginWithSelfHostedOAuth`: mint a nonce, hand the browser off, accept only a callback carrying that nonce back. Desktop has the OS route the reply; self-hosted has no OS hop, so our own approval page performs it. That is the point — the human half happens on an origin we control. ``` instance SaaS admin's browser | POST connect/request | | | (name, callback, nonce, | | | claim-secret hash) | | |-------------------------->| | | <- requestId + authorizeUrl | | | GET /link?request=... | | |<-------------------------------| | | sign in (SSO works here), | | | see ACCOUNT + ORIGIN, approve | | |------------------------------->| | | 302 callback#nonce+session | | POST connect/claim | | | (requestId, claim secret)| | |-------------------------->| | | <- device credential | | ``` Four properties carry the safety, and each is stated in the code because each is easy to lose in a refactor: - **The redirect target is never caller-supplied.** Validated once at creation, then read back from the stored row, so nothing in the approval page's URL can steer the token elsewhere. - **Approval and minting are separate.** Approval records the team and hands out nothing usable; the credential is minted only on claim, authenticated by a secret that never entered a browser. - **A re-authentication cannot move a server between teams.** The team is pinned at creation from the credential only that instance holds, so an approver from another team gets `WRONG_TEAM` instead of a rebind. - **The approver has to confirm what they are binding.** The page shows the address and the signed-in account, with a way to switch, and a checkbox naming the address gates the approve button. The name the server reports is deliberately not shown: the requester picks it on an unauthenticated endpoint, and its honest value is the hostname already in the address. The session rides the URL fragment, so it stays out of access logs and `Referer`, and is stripped before anything awaits. The claim is row-locked, so one approval mints once. A request lives 30 minutes; a settled one is not offered again, since approving it fails server-side. Signing in mid-flow no longer loses the request. The id is kept on the SaaS origin and resumed after any sign-in, which is what makes creating an account work: the confirmation email opens a new tab, where the `next` parameter is gone. Reading it does not consume it — the request may be open in two tabs — and only a recorded decision retires it. The result lands as a modal over the portal the admin started from, and the portal re-reads its link status so the page behind agrees with the modal. Plaintext `http://` callbacks are accepted rather than refused, because many self-hosted instances legitimately run plain HTTP on a private network; the address carries a warning icon explaining the risk, derived server-side so a requester cannot suppress it. Hard-refusing `http://` to a public IP literal is a reasonable follow-up; a bare hostname can't be classified without a DNS lookup, so the warning stays the general mechanism. ## Configuration Four surfaces. Placeholders below, not values. **SaaS backend** | Setting | Needed | Why | |---|---|---| | `stirling.billing.account-link.enabled` | Yes, `true` | The connect controller and service are `@ConditionalOnProperty` with no default, so without it the endpoints do not exist. | | `system.frontendUrl` | Only when the approval page is not on the API's own origin | Where the approver is sent. Must include the app's base path if it is served under one, or the redirect misses `/link`. | **SaaS frontend** | Setting | Needed | Why | |---|---|---| | `VITE_SUPABASE_URL`, `VITE_SUPABASE_PUBLISHABLE_DEFAULT_KEY` | Yes | Its own sign-in. Must be the project the SaaS backend validates tokens against. | | `RUN_SUBPATH` | Only if served under a subpath | Moves the approval page to `<base>/<subpath>/link`, so `system.frontendUrl` has to agree. | **Self-hosted backend** | Setting | Needed | Why | |---|---|---| | `stirling.billing.account-link.enabled` | Yes, `true` | Defaults to `false`. | | `stirling.billing.account-link.saas-base-url` | Yes | Origin of the SaaS API it links to. Not the SaaS frontend. | | `system.frontendUrl` | Optional | Externally reachable base URL for the callback. Otherwise derived from the request's `Origin`, which is right for ordinary deployments and wrong behind a rewriting proxy. | **Self-hosted frontend** | Setting | Needed | Why | |---|---|---| | `VITE_SUPABASE_URL`, `VITE_SUPABASE_PUBLISHABLE_DEFAULT_KEY` | Yes | Accepts the session handed over in the callback fragment. | | `VITE_SAAS_API_URL` | For Usage and Billing | Attended reads go to the SaaS API with the admin's token. Absent, those surfaces stay on the mock. | | `VITE_INCLUDE_PORTAL` | Production builds | Dev builds include the portal automatically; without it there is no link UI and no callback route. | Two things worth stating because neither fails loudly: - **Both frontends must use the URL *and* key of the same Supabase project**, and the same one the SaaS backend validates against. A key from one project with a URL from another is accepted by the browser and rejected by Supabase, which surfaces much later as "session expired" on Usage rather than as an error at hand-over. - **The Supabase redirect allow-list must contain the SaaS app's `/auth/callback`**, since a confirmation email returns through it. Entries are matched exactly. - **`system.frontendUrl` is the existing setting for this**, not a new one, so each side reads its own value and there is nothing extra to configure. It also gates share links, so on a stack with storage and sharing already on, setting it here turns those on too. The self-hosted side deliberately does **not** configure where the approval page lives — SaaS answers that in the connect-request reply, being the only party that knows. Also here, because testing this needs two stacks side by side: `linked:staging` / `linked:dev` (which derive `system.frontendUrl` and `RUN_SUBPATH` themselves), the missing `frontend:staging:saas`, and a per-mode vite `cacheDir` — two dev servers in different modes otherwise re-optimise over one shared dep cache. ## How to test Automated and green: `task frontend:check:all` plus both backend modules. `ConnectRequestServiceTest` covers callback validation, the per-IP cap, single-use approval, claim outcomes, expiry, `WRONG_TEAM` and reauth confirming without minting; `ConnectServiceTest` covers callback-resolution precedence including a foreign-origin callback being discarded; `ConnectControllerTest` covers the authorize URL, including the forwarded-header path and only the first hop being trusted; `ConnectCallback.test.tsx` covers the fragment being stripped synchronously and malformed fragments refused; `LinkAccountModal.test.tsx` covers link and reauth hitting different endpoints. Manual walkthrough: 1. `task linked:staging` — added here; brings up a SaaS stack and a self-hosted instance pointed at it, on discovered ports, and prints the four addresses. 2. Open the link-account modal in the self-hosted portal and continue. Expect the SaaS approval page at `/link?request=<id>`. 3. Sign in as a team leader, or create an account and confirm the email. Either way you should come back to the approval page. 4. Tick the acknowledgement and approve. Expect the fragment gone from the address bar immediately, a result modal over the portal, the portal showing linked without a reload, and attended reads (Usage, Billing) working without a second sign-in. 5. Repeat, approving as a member of a different team. Expect a refusal, not a rebind. ## Outstanding - #7415 to be reworked against this design once this lands. - **No SaaS-side UI to disconnect a server.** `GET /account-link/instances` and `POST /account-link/instances/{id}/revoke` are already team-scoped and leader-gated, and the portal has a panel that uses them, but `portal-saas/components/settings/accountLinkSettings.tsx` exports `null` on the reasoning that "SaaS has no account-link concept". That held when linking was a self-hosted admin managing their own instance; here a leader approves a server they may not administer, and has no way to withdraw it. The seam to fill is that one file. Expected to land with the CTA work in #7415. --------- Co-authored-by: James Brunton <jbrunton96@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
dbd60d4765 |
Replace Prettier with Oxfmt (#7422)
# Description of Changes Prettier takes about 10 seconds to run over our frontend folder, but [Oxfmt](https://oxc.rs/docs/guide/usage/formatter.html) does an (almost) identical job in 0.2 seconds. This PR converts our Prettier integration to an equivalent Oxfmt integration. There's exactly 2 files in the frontend folder that Oxfmt formats differently to Prettier so it'll barely cause any disruption to the source. I've removed the `--check` option from the frontend tool models generator as part of this because we can do the same thing with Task easily enough and Oxfmt isn't directly importable like Prettier since it's a Rust binary instead of a JS library. Originally I was shelling out to Oxfmt on single-file mode to keep it all in memory but it just seemed more likely that there'd be config mismatches between that script and the task so I think it's better this way. |
||
|
|
6bae9d516d |
chore(saas): one task per environment, and make the frontend follow it (#7483)
## The problem The `dev` profile hardcoded one project ref (`qacaivhsjtftfwtgjvva`) in five places: the ref, the Supabase URL, the publishable key, the datasource host and the meter endpoint. That made it both the shared environment everyone relies on *and* the only thing you could point the backend at. Testing an open SaaS PR meant hand-overriding all five via env just to reach that PR's Supabase preview branch, which is the only place the PR's migrations have actually been applied. Get it wrong and you see `relation "stirling_pdf.<new table>" does not exist` for a table the PR added, which is what happened on [#7414](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/pull/7414). ## One task per environment ```bash task dev:saas # backend + frontend + engine, against this PR's preview branch task staging:saas # backend + frontend + engine, against the shared v3 project task backend:dev:saas # backend only, preview branch task backend:staging:saas # backend only, v3 ``` | | how | vars | project | |---|---|---|---| | prod | `PROFILES=none` | `SAAS_DB_*` | the live one | | staging | `PROFILES=staging` | `SAAS_STAGING_*` | pinned to v3, always there | | dev | `PROFILES=dev` | `SAAS_DEV_*` | follows a SaaS PR's preview branch | `PROFILES` is still the underlying switch, so the old spelling keeps working. Production deliberately has no named task: reaching it should take a conscious `PROFILES=none`, not a tab-complete. **staging** is the old `dev` configuration, moved and kept pinned. The value of a shared environment is that it is still there tomorrow: reproduce a bug, paste a link to a colleague, share data. **dev** is parameterised by `SAAS_DEV_PROJECT_REF` and derives the Supabase URL, JWT issuer, JWKS, meter endpoint and (unless overridden) the database host from it. Switching which PR you are testing is one variable instead of five. With no ref set, `task backend:dev:saas` stops and says what to set rather than falling back. ## The frontend was the real gap `frontend/editor/.env` is committed and pins the **production** Supabase project, and nothing in the frontend knew about dev or staging. So `task dev:saas` gave you a backend on a preview branch and a login against prod, unless you happened to have hand-written `frontend/editor/.env.saas.local`. The dev tasks now read the backend's env files and derive `VITE_SUPABASE_URL` and `VITE_SUPABASE_PUBLISHABLE_DEFAULT_KEY` from the same project ref the backend resolved, so the two halves cannot point at different projects. Nothing to keep in sync by hand, no new vite mode, and `SAAS_ENV=prod` opts back out to the committed values. ## Where to put your local values Two files, both gitignored, neither ever committed: **`app/.env.saas.local`** is the only one you normally need. The tasks load it for the backend *and* the frontend. ```bash # staging: everything else is already defaulted, so this is all it takes SAAS_STAGING_DB_PASSWORD=... # dev: the preview branch of the PR you are testing, from its "Supabase Preview" check. # A branch has its OWN password and API keys; the parent project's will not authenticate. SAAS_DEV_PROJECT_REF=... SAAS_DEV_DB_PASSWORD=... SAAS_DEV_PUBLISHABLE_KEY=... # prod, if you ever need it SAAS_DB_PROJECT_REF=... SAAS_DB_URL=... SAAS_DB_PASSWORD=... SUPABASE_EDGE_FUNCTION_SECRET=... ``` **`frontend/editor/.env.saas.local`** is no longer needed for choosing a Supabase project, and is best left empty or deleted. If you have one from before this PR, note that the task-supplied values now win, which is the point: the frontend follows the backend. **A blank is not the same as absent.** A dotenv line with an empty value still *sets* the variable, and Spring's `${VAR:default}` only falls back when a variable is absent. So `.env.saas` lists what you must set as blanks, and leaves out the two `*_DB_URL` overrides, which have real defaults to fall back to. This is not theoretical, see below. Committed `app/.env.saas` holds non-secret defaults only. Real secrets are passwords, the edge-function secret and service-role keys. Project refs and publishable keys are neither: a ref is the public `<ref>.supabase.co` subdomain and a publishable key ships in the browser bundle by design, which is why `frontend/editor/.env` has always carried prod's. ## Three bugs found while building the tasks All three were in this PR's own earlier commits, and all three were caught by actually booting things rather than by reading the config. **staging could not boot at all.** A blank `SAAS_STAGING_DB_URL=` in `.env.saas` set the variable to empty, so `${SAAS_STAGING_DB_URL:jdbc:...}` resolved to `""` and startup failed with `spring.datasource.url is required when the saas profile is active`. The file already carried a comment warning about exactly this; it had only been applied to the dev block. The original verification for this PR was "placeholders resolve" and "the task parses", neither of which boots anything. **The dev to staging fallback ran `ddl-auto=update` against shared v3.** The dev profile sets `update`, which is right for a disposable preview branch, and separately fell back to staging's project ref. Together that meant Hibernate was free to reconcile tables that RLS policies depend on. `application-staging.properties` pins `none`, but that only applies when the staging profile is the active one, which it was not on the fallback path. There is no fallback now: with no ref the task stops before gradle, and the frontend fails the same way, both naming the variable. **`PROFILES=` never selected production.** Go template `default` treats `""` as absent, so it silently resolved back to `dev`. It is `PROFILES=none` now. ## Two choices worth reviewing **Staging keeps its committed project ref**, now as a `${SAAS_STAGING_PROJECT_REF:...}` default in one place, with the URL, database host and meter endpoint all derived from it. So staging still works with zero setup, and repointing it is one variable. Nothing in CI referenced the ref or the profile. Its publishable key default carries no inline `gitleaks:allow`: a trailing comment in a `.properties` file is part of the value, so the pragma ended up inside the key. It is in `.gitleaksignore` instead. **`SAAS_DEV_DB_URL` still overrides the whole URL**, so a branch needing the pooler host rather than the direct one is reachable without touching committed config. ## Verification - `task backend:staging:saas` boots against v3 and serves `200`. It could not boot before this commit. - `task backend:dev:saas` with no ref stops before gradle naming the variable, and `PROFILES=none` still reaches production. `task frontend:dev:saas` fails the same way; `SAAS_ENV=staging` still resolves with no local config. - Frontend routing picks the SaaS runner for dev/staging and the plain runner for prod; the derivation returns the right URL and key for each. - Vite's `process.env` precedence and Task's dotenv/env semantics were measured, not assumed. That is how one trap surfaced: Task sets an `env:` key even when its value resolves to empty, and Vite treats an empty `process.env` `VITE_*` as authoritative over a committed `.env`. Putting the Supabase vars on the shared `dev:_run` would have blanked Supabase config for the core, proprietary and desktop dev servers, so the SaaS path has its own runner. - `:saas:spotlessApply` and `:saas:compileJava` green. `DevProfileProjectNotice` becomes `SaasProjectNotice` and covers both profiles, stating the project ref and `ddl-auto` at startup so which environment you are on is never a guess. No behaviour change for prod: the `saas` profile is untouched. |
||
|
|
588afb6306 |
Fix a11y violations in nightlies and improve a11y config (#7499)
# Description of Changes This fixes the a11y violations that are currently failing in the nightlies in dark mode. Now that we're down to 0 baseline, we can require the a11y tests to pass in PRs before they merge, so I've changed that, and I've also made it so that the nightly will report failures in both light and dark mode instead of just light mode if that fails. <img width="2560" height="838" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b0322182-f6ff-4dea-9a1c-5a6c9c9c5439" /> |
||
|
|
0be10b2dff |
Cucumber concurrency validation plus fix (#7379)
# Description of Changes cucumber tests to run multiple threads of commands at same time --- ## Checklist ### General - [ ] I have read the [Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings ### Documentation - [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/) (if functionality has heavily changed) - [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags) (for new translation tags only) ### Translations (if applicable) - [ ] I ran [`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md) ### UI Changes (if applicable) - [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached (e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR) ### Testing (if applicable) - [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests pass - [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing) for more details. |
||
|
|
ba06a1dc1b |
fix(desktop): stop Task from eating the PowerShell variables in jlink… (#7258)
…:runtime
The Windows branch of jlink:runtime clears the read-only attribute jlink
leaves on the bundled JRE, so Tauri can overwrite the staged copies. It
never worked.
Task does not hand the command to cmd.exe; it runs it through its own
POSIX shell, which expands `$_` and `$false` as shell variables. Neither
is set, so both became empty and PowerShell was asked to run
ForEach-Object { .IsReadOnly = }
which errors on every file. Verified against a directory of read-only
files: the double-quoted form leaves 3 of 3 still read-only and exits
non-zero, the single-quoted form clears all 3 and exits 0.
Single quotes stop the expansion. Also add -File: without it
Get-ChildItem yields directories too, and DirectoryInfo has no
IsReadOnly property, so those iterations would fail even once the
variables survive.
The POSIX branch above is unaffected - chmod needs no variables.
# Description of Changes
<!--
Please provide a summary of the changes, including:
- What was changed
- Why the change was made
- Any challenges encountered
Closes #(issue_number)
-->
---
## Checklist
### General
- [ ] I have read the [Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to
Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
### Documentation
- [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc
repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/)
(if functionality has heavily changed)
- [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation
Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags)
(for new translation tags only)
### Translations (if applicable)
- [ ] I ran
[`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md)
### UI Changes (if applicable)
- [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached
(e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR)
### Testing (if applicable)
- [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests
pass
- [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing)
for more details.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
6eca6ba65c |
Change frontend CI to only run tests once (#7431)
# Description of Changes Frontend CI is currently set to run `task frontend:check:all`, which runs the tests, and then manually runs them a second time with coverage enabled. This adds about 4 minutes onto the runtime of the frontend tests for no reason. This PR changes the `frontend:test` rule to respond to the `COVERAGE` and `CI` env vars to enable coverage analysis of the frontend tests if the setting tells them to. |
||
|
|
05eb74022a |
chore(ci): migrate Python tooling to uv and standardize workflow execution (#7386)
# Description of Changes This PR modernizes the project's Python tooling across GitHub Actions by migrating CI workflows from pip-based dependency management to `uv` and aligning Python execution with the engine project's managed environment. ### What was changed - Replaced `actions/setup-python` and ad-hoc `pip install` steps with `astral-sh/setup-uv` across CI workflows. - Configured shared `uv` dependency caching using `engine/pyproject.toml` and `engine/uv.lock`. - Updated Python script execution to use `uv run --project engine --locked` for a consistent runtime environment. - Replaced package installation steps with `uv sync` for the required dependency groups (e.g. `tools` and `cucumber`). - Added Docker image build validation for both production and development AI engine images. - Updated workflow cache configuration and Docker build context where required. - Removed obsolete Python requirements files that are no longer needed after the migration. - Applied minor Python code modernizations, including import cleanup, modern built-in generic type annotations (`list[...]`, `tuple[...]`, `float | None`), and small style improvements. - Removed unnecessary Python formatter/linter extensions from the development container configuration. ### Why the change was made - Standardize Python dependency management across the repository. - Reduce duplicated dependency installation logic in CI. - Improve workflow performance through shared dependency caching. - Ensure all Python utilities execute against the same locked dependency set managed by the engine project. - Simplify long-term maintenance by eliminating legacy requirements files and pip-specific workflow steps. --- ## Checklist ### General - [ ] I have read the [Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings ### Documentation - [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/) (if functionality has heavily changed) - [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags) (for new translation tags only) ### Translations (if applicable) - [ ] I ran [`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md) ### UI Changes (if applicable) - [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached (e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR) ### Testing (if applicable) - [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests pass - [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing) for more details. --------- Signed-off-by: Carsten Drewes <c.drewes@stud.uni-hannover.de> Co-authored-by: albanobattistella <34811668+albanobattistella@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: kastenherri <116314318+kastenherri@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Anthony Stirling <77850077+Frooodle@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: James Brunton <jbrunton96@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
7bf18cc4c7 |
Storybook: render off the app's real theme CSS, stop hardcoding story colours, and gate a11y in dark mode too (#7187)
## What Makes Storybook render components with the same CSS the app gives them. - The preview loaded the token primitives but **not the editor's semantic token layer** (`styles/theme.css`), so components styled on those variables rendered unthemed — three onboarding stories were importing it by hand to stop their modal surfaces rendering transparent. It's now loaded in the preview and the workarounds are gone. - **Portal stories render inside the `.portal-scope` wrapper** PortalApp mounts, so the portal's scoped reset and typography apply to them exactly as in the app — and, deliberately, to nothing else. - The folder stories invented their own hex colours, two of which aren't values the app's `FOLDER_COLOR_PALETTE` can produce. They now use the palette, so they can't drift from what a user can actually pick. Deliberately does **not** load `tailwind.css` — tailwind is on its way out of the editor, so matching the token layer alone is the target state. ## Story colours route through the tokens, enforced Stories were exempt from the `code-colors` lint, and it showed: hardcoded hexes for surfaces the tokens already name (chat bubbles, borders, demo backgrounds), `var(--x, #hex)` fallbacks that mask a renamed token by silently painting the stale colour, and mocked category accents for which real `--color-cat-*` tokens exist. - Styling literals now use tokens; the dead fallbacks are stripped. - The stories exemption is removed from `theme-lint`, so this can't regress. - Colours that are **the datum itself** — `ColorInput` values, signature ink, per-policy accents, brand-mark swatches — stay literal via `theme-allow-color`, hoisted to named consts so the exemption and its reason sit together. A practical side effect: stories styled on tokens actually respond to the dark-mode toolbar toggle, which is what makes a dark-theme a11y pass meaningful later. ## The a11y gate now runs dark as well as light Contrast is most of what axe reports and it is theme-dependent, so a light-only gate left half the surface unmeasured — and it only becomes measurable at all once the tokens above actually flip. `SCAN_THEME=dark` pins the theme for a whole scan run, every a11y task runs both themes, and each theme has its own baseline: - **light** re-recorded against the themed rendering (the old baseline measured colours the app never shows): 831 stories with violations - **dark** recorded for the first time: 798 stories with violations, 980 story-rule pairs, zero render failures across the full sweep Verified end to end: dark scans measure against dark surfaces (`#18181b` vs `#ffffff`), both baselines self-check clean, and a live scan of stories that changed on main after recording passes both gates. Nightly's timeout doubles for the second sweep. ## Testing Typecheck (all variants), ESLint and Prettier pass. Onboarding, folder, portal and control stories render in the browser scan (39/39) with the per-story CSS imports removed; every story touched by the colour sweep renders too (58/58). `task frontend:lint:colors` passes with stories included. |
||
|
|
78acd9a14b |
Run Playwright on all platforms in PRs (#7304)
# Description of Changes Nightlies keep failing because the Playwright tests only run on Chrome in PRs. This PR changes it so that we run all 3 browsers in all (frontend) PRs so we catch these things before they merge in. They run in parallel so it won't take any more time for the CI to finish. |
||
|
|
37a48aa7a7 |
Replace ESLint and dpdm with Oxlint (#7330)
# Description of Changes Smaller scope than #6689 to try and get this finished. Replace ESLint and dpdm with Oxlint, a TS linter written in Rust so its performance is dramatically better than the existing tools we use. ## Speed improvement - Current ESLint run: 13.76s - Current dpdm run: 3.59s - Total time: 17.35s - New Oxlint run: 0.90s So Oxlint is about a 20x speed improvement. ## Differences When I last tried to do this, we could recreate our rules identically with Oxlint, but that's not true any more. Oxlint has no current equivalent for ESLint's `no-restricted-syntax` rule, which we were using to ban usages of `<button>` and stuff in specific components to try and encourage them to use our shared UI. This is a very recent addition to our linting config, and personally I'm willing to drop it for now at least. We can still ban specific imports in files, so the files which we were trying to enforce shared UI will still ban directly importing Mantine, so that'll probably be most of the cases still caught, but I think there are other ways we can encourage using the shared UI beyond just using the linter for it. I did try building a custom TS rule for it and it only slowed it down a tiny bit (it took 1.1s) but it had to be built on an unreleased alpha API which just sounds like a maintenance headache we don't need to deal with for a rule that we don't really need. |
||
|
|
8f5344ec7d |
build(tool-models): separate API model generation from Swagger setup (#7300)
# Description of Changes - Added internal `_generate` tasks for frontend and engine tool-model generation. - Kept the public `tool-models` tasks responsible for dependency installation and Swagger generation. - Separated environment preparation from the actual model generation commands. - This allows higher-level tasks to prepare the OpenAPI specification once and invoke both generators without repeating the backend setup. --- ## Checklist ### General - [ ] I have read the [Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings ### Documentation - [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/) (if functionality has heavily changed) - [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags) (for new translation tags only) ### Translations (if applicable) - [ ] I ran [`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md) ### UI Changes (if applicable) - [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached (e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR) ### Testing (if applicable) - [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests pass - [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing) for more details. |
||
|
|
921bdac4b7 |
Desktop installer fixes (#7174)
# Description of Changes
* Adds a `windows-11-arm` CI/release leg (NSIS, Microsoft JDK 25,
updater keys); JPDFium natives deliberately excluded
(`jpdfiumPlatforms=none`) until published, so don't ship ARM64
installers to users yet
* Defaults `WEBKIT_DISABLE_DMABUF_RENDERER=1` on Linux (crash switching
tools on NVIDIA)
* Strips the bundled libwayland from AppImages (blank window on Fedora
Wayland)
* Blocks off-app webview navigation + window drop guard + close failsafe
(drag-drop bricks the app)
* 120s startup grace before the backend is declared unhealthy, restart
success only announced after a real health check ("Backend stopped
unexpectedly" spam and likely the OAuth port churn)
* Verified: green `windows-arm64` build (234 MB NSIS artifact) and green
Linux run with libwayland confirmed stripped
* JPDFium fixes for multi threading issues
---
## Checklist
### General
- [ ] I have read the [Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to
Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md)
(if applicable)
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
### Documentation
- [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc
repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/)
(if functionality has heavily changed)
- [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation
Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags)
(for new translation tags only)
### Translations (if applicable)
- [ ] I ran
[`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md)
### UI Changes (if applicable)
- [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached
(e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR)
### Testing (if applicable)
- [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests
pass
- [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing
Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing)
for more details.
|
||
|
|
cd199c8659 |
Define tool inputs & outputs in a structured way (#7204)
# Description of Changes Change tool APIs to use structured definitions for input/output/type info because we need that info to be able to validate whether policies can actually successfully work based on whether one tool accepts the output of another. There were various bugs in the previous string definitions because of either misspellings or just incorrect definitions, so I've gone through and fixed all that I can find. <img width="729" height="271" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/08357e96-6fbb-4b9c-ba4d-8995420c7b86" /> <img width="749" height="264" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/76f46284-1866-4b64-b1ed-2480e01866e9" /> <img width="402" height="636" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8f7a36ca-2845-4f14-a2df-ec9c772e66f6" /> <img width="393" height="317" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/46d8b891-9820-4ce3-8109-a8b782277037" /> --------- Co-authored-by: Anthony Stirling <77850077+Frooodle@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
4191d347ff |
Fix Java tests not running headless on Mac (#7260)
# Description of Changes The `task backend:test` command automatically spawns new Java processes in the dock on Mac as it runs, which takes the focus away from whatever the developer is doing at the time. This is because there's missing a missing `headless` tag in the `build.gradle` file (the tests don't spawn or require any windows, so they run fine headless). Also adds a `task backend:test:force` rule to run the tests without cache because the cache was getting in the way of testing this. <img width="175" height="98" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d4524959-9c25-4513-bf34-9fd48310c4d3" /> |
||
|
|
9d473fb435 |
Resolve duplicate CSS selectors reported by Stylelint (#7212)
Fixes #7189 Consolidates all 29 `no-duplicate-selectors` violations across 18 stylesheets by merging later duplicate rule blocks into the first occurrence. Where duplicates had conflicting values, the cascade-winning (later) value was kept, so computed styles are unchanged. Also: - Adds `frontend/stylelint.config.mjs` with only `no-duplicate-selectors` enabled (Prettier and the theme linter own everything else). - Adds a `frontend:lint:css` task, wired into `task frontend:lint` as a blocking check so regressions can't creep back in. - Lints all first-party CSS (`editor/**/*.css`, so `public/css` and any future non-`src` stylesheets are covered too), excluding only the vendored `cookieconsent.css` and build output via `ignoreFiles`. This surfaced and fixed 5 additional duplicate selectors in `cookieconsentCustomisation.css` that weren't in the original issue report. Note: `portal/views/Sources.css` goes beyond dedup — the whole `.portal-sources__connections*` block is deleted as dead code (unreferenced since the S3 connections redesign in #6965; only `-actions` in it was an actual duplicate). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) |
||
|
|
6933d11bce |
Type-check Storybook files (#7223)
# Description of Changes Storybook files aren't currently being type-checked, but they should be. A bunch of them had a dodgy import in them (which didn't affect anything because it was just an `import type` but still worth fixing). |
||
|
|
b35329c8f5 |
a11y scan: generate required assets, and fail when a story file can't load (#7201)
## What Two related bugs found while looking at why #7187's a11y check behaves differently on CI than locally. ### 21 stories were never being scanned on CI The scan tasks only depended on `install`, not `prepare`. On a fresh checkout that means the generated icon set (`editor/src/assets/material-symbols-icons.json`, gitignored) doesn't exist, so every story that reaches `LocalIcon` fails to import: ``` Failed to resolve import "../../../assets/material-symbols-icons.json" from "editor/src/core/components/shared/LocalIcon.tsx" ``` On CI that was four story files / 21 stories, every run. It works locally only because our trees already have the file from a previous build. The scan tasks now depend on `prepare`, like the `build:*` tasks do. ### The gate reported those runs as clean Worse than the missing stories: a file that fails to import produces a **failed suite with no assertions**. Every check in `a11y-check.mjs` reads assertions, so the file satisfied the manifest, contributed nothing to compare, and the run printed `✓ no a11y regressions`. An assertion-less failed suite now fails the gate and points at the scan log for the underlying resolve error. `--record` refuses in the same situation, so a baseline can't be written that quietly drops those stories. Also switched the affected-story emptiness test to single quotes, since that list now carries its own per-path quoting (it was producing `[ -z ""a" "b"" ]`). ## Testing - Deleted the generated asset to reproduce a fresh checkout: the gate **fails** with the file named and the cause explained, where before it printed `✓ no a11y regressions` and exited 0. - With the `prepare` dependency the task regenerates the asset itself and the previously-invisible files scan: 21 stories, 35 story-rule pairs, all already baselined. |
||
|
|
bbd4d2c3ac |
Redesign toml sorting to speed up from ~40s to ~2s (#7192)
# Description of Changes The `pre-commit` tool to sort the translations is really slow. It took ~40 seconds to run because it's using a parser which attempts to save all of the formatting data from the Toml. Our translations toml is pretty much entirely formatted anyway, so there's no point in trying to preserve any of that data. The only thing we lose is 5 comments, none of which are needed anyway and only appear in the US translation file. By switching to Python stdlib `tomllib` reading and `tomli-w` for writing, we can make the Toml formatting job take 2.11 seconds, where it used to take 39.78s. The whole pre-commit job now takes 4.58 seconds. |
||
|
|
4d207f0c3f |
a11y job: scan stories when their component changes; fix cold-start false failures (#7191)
## What Two fixes to the pull-request a11y job (#7086 follow-up), both found on its first day live. ### It now scans a component's stories when the component changes The job picked its scan set from changed **story files** alone. But a story renders the live component — editing `Button.tsx` changes what every Button story shows without touching a story file, and the job scanned nothing. That's the common way a11y regressions arrive, and it was exactly the case the job missed. The scan set now also includes stories whose **same-named sibling source file changed**: edit `Button.tsx` or `Button.css` and `Button.stories.tsx` is scanned. Changes that ripple further than a component's own stories (shared UI, theme tokens) remain the nightly sweep's job. ### It no longer fails on cold-start infrastructure noise The job's first real run (#7163) flagged a story as "failed to render". The story was fine — on a cold dependency cache (**every** CI run), Vite discovered the preview's own dependency graph mid-run and reloaded the page, killing whichever story happened to be loading with `Failed to fetch dynamically imported module`. Reproduced on a cold cache, passes on a warm one. - The preview's deps are named in `optimizeDeps.include`, which removes the mid-run reload (verified cold). - A batch whose report contains crash-class failures (failures carrying no axe rule) is retried once — a one-off infrastructure death passes the retry, a story that genuinely can't render fails both attempts and is still reported. Also: the scan-report artifacts were never actually uploading — they live in a dot-directory, which `upload-artifact` silently skips as hidden by default. `include-hidden-files: true` fixes that for the PR job and the nightly, so a red run finally has its evidence attached. ### The glue is Node now, so tasks work from any shell Raised in review: the pipeline leaned on `bash`, `sed`, `grep`, `sort` and `tr`. Task runs its commands in an embedded POSIX interpreter, but those are external binaries it has to find on PATH — and a Windows dev calling tasks from **PowerShell** has none of them (`sed`/`tr` missing outright, `sort` resolves to Windows' own, and `bash` resolves to *WSL's*). Confirmed broken by running the task from PowerShell before the change. The batch runner and affected-story detection are now small Node scripts (`a11y-scan.mjs`, `a11y-changed.mjs`) — the repo already requires Node, so one implementation serves PowerShell, git-bash and CI alike, instead of maintaining `.sh`/`.ps1` twins. ## Testing - Sibling detection: editing `Tabs.tsx` (component only) pulls `Tabs.stories.tsx` into the scan set; editing a `.css` sibling does the same; nothing unrelated leaks in. - **From PowerShell**: `task frontend:storybook:a11y:changed` early-exits cleanly with no changes, and with a component edit it detects the sibling, runs the browser scan and passes the gate — same result from git-bash. - Cold cache end-to-end: cleared both Vite caches, ran the scan — no re-optimize, no reload, stories fail only on their (baselined) axe results. - Crash classifier: 1 on a synthetic crash report, 0 on axe-only failures, 0 on a real report — so the retry can't be triggered by legitimate violations. - Full scan + gate run green end-to-end; taskfile parses, workflows are valid YAML, Prettier/ESLint pass. #7163's red check needs no action from that PR's author — it should go green on re-run once this lands. |
||
|
|
8a5470dd01 |
Add an accessibility regression gate for Storybook (#7086)
## What Follow-up to #7073. Turns the story scan into an accessibility gate: stories run axe in a real browser, and CI flags a change that adds a **new** violation. The app has plenty of existing a11y problems (mostly theme-level colour contrast), so rather than block everything on those, they're recorded in `.storybook/a11y-baseline.json` and grandfathered. The gate cares about three things: - a story breaking a rule it wasn't already breaking - a story that fails to render at all - a scan that didn't cover everything it was asked to Starting point: 839 stories carry a known violation, 1058 story-rule pairs. ## Where it runs - **Pull requests** scan only the stories the branch touches — usually seconds. A full sweep is ~30 minutes, too slow to sit in front of every merge, and the `frontend` path filter is broad enough that unrelated changes would pay for it. - **Nightly** scans every story, so a violation introduced somewhere other than the story itself — a shared component, a theme token — still surfaces within a day. - Both upload their scan reports as artifacts; the reports carry the offending selector and help text, without which a red run can only be understood by reproducing it locally. - **Advisory to start with.** It is deliberately not in `all-checks-passed`, so it reports without blocking. Worth promoting once a few weeks of runs show the pass/fail is stable. ## Using it - **Fixed some violations?** `task frontend:storybook:a11y:record` re-records so the gate locks the improvement in. - **Locally:** `task frontend:storybook:a11y:changed` for your branch, `task frontend:storybook:a11y` for everything. - **New component?** Its story is picked up automatically. ## Testing - Every story — 526 files, ~1,450 stories — runs in a real browser with no render failures, and the gate reports no regressions against the baseline. - Running the gate over a single changed story takes seconds, which is the pull-request path. - The gate's own behaviour is covered against synthetic scan reports: a new rule fails, the same rule on more nodes does not, a crashed story fails, an incomplete scan refuses to report, and re-recording refuses while anything is crashing. - Typecheck (all build variants), ESLint and Prettier pass. ## Notes for reviewers Some of this PR is making the mechanism trustworthy rather than adding features, so it's worth knowing what changed and why: - Rule ids come from the axe docs URL in each violation, not a hand-maintained list of rule names — the old list silently ignored 39 of axe's 104 rules, including `object-alt`, `target-size` and the table rules. - The baseline records **which** rules a story breaks, not how many nodes break them. Node counts drift between runs because stories fetch asynchronously and axe samples whatever has rendered, which made unrelated changes look like regressions. For the same reason the baseline is the union of repeated scans, so a run can only be a subset of it. - A story that fails for a non-a11y reason used to yield no rule id and was recorded as clean, which hid crashes and could mask real violations. Those now fail, and re-recording refuses to run while any story is crashing. - The scan writes a manifest of every story file it intends to cover and the check fails unless all of them reported, so a dropped batch can't read as "no violations". - Vite was pre-bundling the JSX runtime mid-run and reloading the page, which crashed whichever stories were loading; those deps are now named up front and the per-story timeout is above the 5s default. Colour contrast dominates the baseline and is theme-level, tracked separately from this. |
||
|
|
22ec0947c9 |
Storybook coverage: scan harness + stories (#7073)
## What Gets most of the app's components into Storybook and adds a scan that runs every story in a real browser, so we have a base to build accessibility testing on next. - **~380 new stories**, taking story files from 144 to 526. Components with a story: | Layer | Before | After | |---|---|---| | core | 41 / 309 (13%) | **183 / 309 (59%)** | | portal | 91 / 161 (57%) | **127 / 161 (79%)** | | proprietary | 1 / 105 (1%) | **39 / 105 (37%)** | | cloud / desktop / saas / portal-saas / prototypes | 0 / 84 | 0 / 84 (unchanged) | | **Total** | **133 / 659 (20%)** | **349 / 659 (53%)** | Both columns are counted the same way — every `.tsx` exporting a component, so the denominator includes things that aren't really visual units (contexts, providers, barrels). Excluding those it's 22% → 58%. Either way it's reproducible from the tree rather than a number you have to take on trust. - **Scan harness** — the Storybook Vitest addon runs each story in headless Chromium as a **render/smoke check** (a story must mount without throwing). New task: `task frontend:storybook:test` (pass a filter, e.g. `-- Button`). Separate Vitest config so it doesn't touch the existing jsdom unit tests. ## Scope - **Stories and Storybook config only, with one exception:** a one-line fix to `ProviderCard`, which re-rendered forever whenever its optional `settings` prop was omitted. Called out because it's the only component source change here. - The preview gains a `QueryClientProvider` (the portal app has one, so stories reaching a query hook threw without it), and the scan task now installs the browser it drives. - **a11y is report-only** and **nothing runs the scan in CI yet** — enforcing a11y and wiring it into CI is the follow-up, #7086. - Components that can't render as an isolated unit are **not** included: anything needing the full editor runtime (ToolWorkflow / FileManager / AppConfig / a live PDF engine) or that's headless (providers, gates, API bridges, config factories). Stories that only rendered by mounting the whole `AppProviders` tree were dropped for the same reason — that isn't isolation, and the tree's ErrorBoundary swallowed render failures so those stories could never fail. A few that need assets the headless browser can't serve are tagged `!test`, so they still show in the UI but sit out the scan. ## Testing Typecheck (all build variants), ESLint, Prettier and the unit suite pass. Every story in the scanned set mounts without throwing. ## Notes for reviewers - Stories use the `@app`/`@core`/`@portal`/`@proprietary` aliases (no deep relative imports) and mock data-fetching components with MSW. - Running the full suite in one go can flake on the Vite dep-optimizer; scan in small batches (or by filter) for a stable local run. |
||
|
|
67e10138b5 |
Follow-up: colour token migration (compat → --c-*, hardcoded hex) (#7011)
Follow-up to #7009, which built the theme token layer (`primitives` → `colors` → `compat`). This PR moves the whole app onto it, removes hardcoded colours, turns on enforcement so they can't come back, and adds a user-selectable accent. ## What this does - **Semantic tokens everywhere** — legacy colour aliases and raw hex are rewritten to `--c-*` tokens (`--c-surface*`, `--c-text*`, `--c-primary`, …). Straight rename, no visual change. Genuine literals (brand/OAuth, colour pickers, data-viz) are left as-is. - **Fixes missing colours** — some tokens the migration referenced were never defined, so a few surfaces (login button, auth banners, badges, procurement view) silently lost their colour. All defined now, and they adapt to light/dark and the accent automatically. - **Blocking colour lint** — CI now fails on hardcoded colours, undefined tokens, or unreadable low-contrast status colours. - **User-selectable accent** — light and dark each get their own accent from Settings → Appearance, contrast-clamped so text stays legible. "Default" keeps the standard blue. ## Still to come Remaining inline-style hex, the legacy token-definition files (`theme.css`, `tokens.css`), and folding `zIndex.ts` onto the dimension tokens. ## Testing `task frontend:check:all` green; light/dark and accent switching spot-checked. |
||
|
|
2c1a666889 |
fix(frontend): make development label detection cross-platform (#6988)
# Description of Changes This PR makes the frontend development label detection compatible with both Windows and Unix-based environments. - Added platform-specific handling to the `STIRLING_DEV_LABEL` Taskfile variable. - Uses PowerShell and `Split-Path` on Windows. - Retains the existing `basename` implementation on Linux and macOS. - Preserves the fallback to the current working directory when the Git repository root cannot be determined. - Fixes `task frontend:dev` and `task dev:all` failing on Windows because `basename` was unavailable. - Handles shell quoting explicitly so PowerShell variables are not expanded by the intermediate command shell. --- ## Checklist ### General - [ ] I have read the [Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings ### Documentation - [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/) (if functionality has heavily changed) - [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags) (for new translation tags only) ### Translations (if applicable) - [ ] I ran [`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md) ### UI Changes (if applicable) - [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached (e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR) ### Testing (if applicable) - [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests pass - [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing) for more details. |
||
|
|
ed58d90ab8 |
Remove policies feature flag (#7031)
# Description of Changes Removes the feature flags for enabling policies on both the backend and frontend. We shouldn't be releasing another self-hosted release that doesn't include policies, so it makes sense to do this now. Builds that don't have the Processor will just not run policies because they won't have any. Beyond that, the API should always be available, but checks whether the user actually has the entitlements to run policies (whether they have credits/a payment method available) |
||
|
|
350c0b796e |
Upgrade to TS7 official release (#6958)
# Description of Changes Convert from the TS7 release candidate to the TS7 official release, keeping TS6 around in [the compatibility mode suggested by Microsoft](https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/announcing-typescript-7-0/#running-side-by-side-with-typescript-6.0) so ESLint and our scripts which rely on the TS API still work. |
||
|
|
b86e963c9d |
initial colors and theme improvements (#7009)
## What this does Consolidates the frontend's colour/theme system into a small, well-defined token layer and reworks the theme picker. The goal was a minimal, scalable set of semantic tokens that the editor **and** the Processor/portal (and Storybook) all share, plus a theme model that's easy to reason about. ## Token architecture (`core/theme/`) A four-file layer, imported once via `index.css`: | File | Role | |---|---| | `primitives.css` | The raw palette — the **only** place literal colours live (neutral ramps `--p-gray-*`/`--p-zinc-*` + status hues). | | `colors.css` | ~21 semantic `--c-*` tokens (surfaces, text, borders, primary, status) mapped from primitives per theme. **Reference these.** | | `compat.css` | Legacy names (`--bg-*`, `--text-*`, `--color-*`) aliased onto `--c-*` via `:root:root` so ~200 existing files keep working. | | `dimensions.css` | All non-colour tokens (spacing, radius, z-index, type, motion) — single source, resolving prior collisions. | A blocking linter (`scripts/lint/theme-lint.mjs`, run in `frontend:lint`) enforces "literals only in `primitives.css`" within `core/theme/`, and has a non-blocking WCAG contrast report. See `core/theme/README.md`. ## Theme model - **Mode** (`light` / `dark` / `system`) and **accent** are independent. Each mode has its own accent (`lightPrimary` / `darkPrimary`). - The editor is always `data-app-theme="custom"`; `ThemeProvider` injects the accent as `--user-primary` and sets `data-accent`. - **Two accent states:** - A **colour** (preset or custom hex) → tints every surface that hue (whole-app theming). - The **`default`** sentinel → neutral surfaces (white/grey light, zinc black/grey dark) with blue buttons, no tint. (`data-accent="default"` opts surfaces out of the tint.) - Accent contrast guardrails (`utils/customPrimary.ts`): lightness clamps so an accent can't collapse into the base, a contrast-picked on-primary foreground, and an accent-as-foreground variant so accent text is never dark-on-dark. ## Theme picker (Settings → General) - 3×5 grid: a distinct **Default** icon chip (not a colour) + 14 curated accents, in a dropdown per mode. - **Custom** colour via the shared `ColorInput`, with a live gamut clamp (`clampValue`) that refuses white/grey/black — the picker handle sticks at the boundary and preserves the working hue at achromatic extremes. - "Restore theme to default" resets both modes. ## Other - Dark mode is a true neutral zinc (no navy "midnight" tint); the Mantine dark ramp and Tailwind dark channels were neutralised to match. - Pre-paint inline script in `index.html` applies theme + accent before first paint (no FOUC); portal and editor now share the same `preferences.theme` source of truth. - High-visibility surfaces migrated to tokens (FAB, landing upload buttons, portal hero banners); scattered per-component colour swaps were intentionally **left for a follow-up** to keep this PR focused. ## Testing - `task frontend:check:all` (typecheck all variants + eslint + prettier + colour-lint) green. - Verified light/dark, default vs tinted accents, and the custom clamp via computed styles in the dev preview. > Note: the `prerender-og` build step failing in the e2e/deploy jobs is unrelated to this diff — it's in `vite.config.ts` (untouched here) and builds cleanly locally. |
||
|
|
fd81bf4cf8 | Tighten whitespace between search bar and tool list (#6977) | ||
|
|
b4f7b1d8a9 |
Add bidirectional API types to frontend (#6867)
# Description of Changes Fix https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF-SaaS/issues/281. Add generated backend API mappings to the frontend code, and the logic to convert from a backend API to frontend parameters objects. Previously, it was impossible to tell if changing the backend API would require a change to the frontend to support it because the frontend had no static type information about the backend API. This PR adds autogenerated tool API types to the frontend (in `toolApiTypes.ts`) and adds explicit typed mappings between the frontend parameter types and the backend API types, so theoretically the type checker should be able to catch issues when changing one puts us in an invalid state with the other. During development, it pointed out several inconsistencies that we have between the frontend and backend types, some of which were genuine bugs, and others were only happening to work because the backend is more permissive than its API claims to be. This also unlocks the ability for us to render the frontend settings on saved backend API structures, which we've previously had to avoid doing because we had no reverse mapping. |
||
|
|
11ba3814e5 |
Restructure Portal code to be inside Editor (#6857)
# Description of Changes We don't have any strong reasons to keep the Portal as a separate Vite app, and it needs access to so many things from the Editor that it no longer makes sense to keep them separate. This PR moves the Portal code to have direct access to the Editor code and gets rid of the shared folder. |
||
|
|
ff3e3bd0fc |
Add desktop hardware token signing and trust-aware signature validation (#6765)
# Description of Changes <img width="432" height="800" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a01ed9ac-220c-4911-9134-b51e0f321be8" /> <img width="408" height="859" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a9c285b6-5b75-493a-95ec-09e08d0f58f1" /> <img width="426" height="874" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a60db96e-be93-4cc5-ba0a-63512c2857ba" /> <img width="356" height="1076" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/24d03674-94d3-40ed-99ee-73395bafae6a" /> --- ## Checklist ### General - [ ] I have read the [Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings ### Documentation - [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/) (if functionality has heavily changed) - [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags) (for new translation tags only) ### Translations (if applicable) - [ ] I ran [`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md) ### UI Changes (if applicable) - [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached (e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR) ### Testing (if applicable) - [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests pass - [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing) for more details. |
||
|
|
14245d33d1 |
feat(saas): account-link — connected self-hosted billing (Mode A) [WIP, flag-gated] (#6738)
> **Draft / WIP.** Combined-billing **Mode A** (connected self-hosted). Entirely behind `stirling.billing.account-link.enabled` (default **off** → beans absent → 404). Pairs with Stirling-PDF-SaaS PR #313 (twin migration → `v3`). ## What this does A self-hosted instance links a SaaS account in the **Portal**, gets a **device credential**, and authenticates unattended metering/entitlement with it — no long-lived user JWT on the server. The Portal then surfaces the team's **billing** (free trial → metered Processor plan) driven by the live wallet. ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant Portal as Portal (browser) participant Supa as SaaS Supabase Auth participant Local as Self-hosted backend participant SaaS as SaaS Java (app/saas) Portal->>Supa: signIn / signUp (Supabase JS, short-lived JWT) Supa-->>Portal: JWT (SDK-refreshed, stays in browser) Portal->>Local: hand JWT (same-origin) Local->>SaaS: POST /account-link/register (Bearer JWT, leader) SaaS-->>Local: { device_id, device_secret } (secret once) Note over Local: store device_secret server-side loop unattended Local->>SaaS: /api/v1/instance/** (X-Device-Id + X-Device-Secret) SaaS-->>Local: entitlement / gate decision end ``` **Auth model:** human auth = Supabase JS (ephemeral JWT, kept for attended portal features). Durable instance auth = a team-bound **device_id + secret** (SHA-256 stored, shown once), non-user `ROLE_LINKED_INSTANCE`, path-scoped to `/api/v1/instance/**`. Instance binds to a **team**, never a user. ## Billing surface (Portal · Mode A states) `Usage & billing` is state-driven by the link/subscription dimension and built to the marketing designs, sharing one component layer across states: - **Unlinked** → link-account prompt. - **Linked · Free** — the *Processor trial*: a one-time 500-PDF free grant ("Process 500 PDFs free, then $X/PDF"), the team's free-editor fleet, and a leader-only **Switch on the Processor →** (embedded Stripe Checkout). - **Linked · Subscribed** — the *Processor plan* dashboard: PDFs-processed split (API / Agents / Automation), **spend this month** vs. a **spend limit** meter with a run-rate projection and an **in-place cap editor** (preset buckets + suggested value + guardrail), Stripe **invoices** (with billed PDFs per invoice), and the default **payment method**. Card / subscription changes deep-link to Stripe's hosted portal. Manual PDF editing is always free — only Automation / AI / API is metered; a `$0` cap blocks all metered work (≠ "no cap"). **Shared, not duplicated:** the editor-fleet card, the Enterprise upsell, and the meter (`@shared/billing` `MeterBar`) render in both the free and subscribed views; money/cap math lives once in `@shared/billing`. The page header is a sticky, full-bleed bar. **New SaaS reads** (defensive — degrade to empty/"—" when the Stripe mirror lacks a table, never 500): - `GET /api/v1/payg/payment-method` — default card (brand / last4 / expiry) from `stripe.payment_methods`. - Invoice **PDFs processed** — billed line-item quantity from `stripe.invoice_line_items`. ## Progress - [x] Schema: `V22 linked_instance` (+ Supabase twin in #313) - [x] `AccountLinkController` register / list / revoke (leader-only, team from caller) - [x] Device-credential filter (path-scoped, constant-time, revocation-aware) + `SupabaseSecurityConfig` wiring (conditional) - [x] `GET /api/v1/instance/whoami` + **`/entitlement`** (reuses `EntitlementService`/`TeamBillingService`) + tests - [x] Self-hosted backend (`app/proprietary`): orchestrator + instance gate (dark + **fail-open**) + tests - [x] Portal: in-app Supabase login modal + register hand-off + `LinkContext` (unlinked default) + "Linked instances" view — all `@shared` Storybook components - [x] **Portal billing surface** — free (Processor trial) + subscribed (Processor plan) Usage views to marketing spec; link-state derived from the **live wallet**; in-place cap editor; over-cap banner - [x] **SaaS reads** — payment-method endpoint + invoice billed-units (defensive `stripe.*` mirror DAOs) + tests - [x] Orphan guard: block leaving/accepting away from a team whose departure orphans its linked instances - [ ] Metering Step 2 (lease + reconcile loop) + bounded fail-open cutoff - [ ] Proprietary hardening (SaaS base-url config, secret-at-rest, finer billable classification) + HTTP integration test - [ ] Cross-repo Stripe lifecycle certified end-to-end (subscribe → meter → cancel → 402) - [ ] Admin ⟺ SaaS-leader enforcement (separate portal-team-mgmt workstream) ## Verification — all green | Gate | Result | |---|---| | `STIRLING_FLAVOR=saas :saas:test` | BUILD SUCCESSFUL (account-link + payg, incl. `PaygPaymentMethodControllerTest`, `PaygInvoicesControllerTest`) | | `:proprietary:test` | BUILD SUCCESSFUL (account-link + entitlement cache/interceptor) | | portal | tsc 0 · eslint 0 · **vitest 55** · storybook build (all billing stories) | | frontend post-sync | typecheck shared + portal + editor (saas + desktop): 0 | ## Screenshots — billing UI _Latest Storybook renders (Portal/Billing). Drag each capture below its caption — kept out of the repo._ **Linked · Free — Processor trial** <img width="1648" height="503" alt="01-free-processor-trial" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/afe6238a-d3b4-47fd-8ea2-cbaed8b0a653" /> **Linked · Subscribed — Processor plan dashboard** <img width="1648" height="930" alt="02-subscribed-processor-plan" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/329e6808-a9a9-4e65-99af-5a8a5e6bf4ab" /> **Spend limit — in-place cap editor** <img width="1648" height="411" alt="03-spend-limit-editor" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/acc95096-bf8e-4ab0-a32c-3c20dc94f816" /> ## Review feedback applied Reworked the portal after first-pass feedback: linking signs in via the **shared Supabase login** (SSO + email/password) — no bespoke form; the **device secret is never shown in or sent to the FE** (the local backend registers + stores it server-side); billing copy reads **PDFs**, not "units"; the wallet surface uses **`@shared` components** matching the SaaS Plan page. Re-verified including an assertion the link response carries no `deviceSecret`/`deviceId`. **Synced onto unified auth + in-app login (2026-06-23).** Merged `main` incl. **#6725 unified auth** (`frontend/shared/auth`); the link flow uses a shared `useSupabaseLogin` hook + `SupabaseLoginForm`, a portal `LinkAccountModal`, and `useAccountLink.completeLink(session)` (+ on-mount SSO redirect-return). Config: `VITE_SAAS_SUPABASE_URL` + `VITE_SAAS_SUPABASE_ANON_KEY`. The local `/account-link/link` call carries the Spring admin bearer with the SaaS JWT in the body. **SSO** needs the SaaS Supabase project to allow-list the portal redirect URL (email/password works without it). ## Assumptions / open - **Proprietary remains a scaffold** (placeholder SaaS base-url, plaintext device secret at rest, coarse billable classification). - Payment-method + invoice-quantity render only when `stripe.payment_methods` / `stripe.invoice_line_items` are in the Sync-Engine target (confirm in the Supabase/Sync-Engine config); otherwise they degrade gracefully. - A self-contained local HTML report + manual E2E runbook live in `notes/account-link-report/` (dev artifacts, outside the repo). --------- Co-authored-by: James Brunton <jbrunton96@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
013f145462 |
Upgrade to TS7 for local type-checking (#6815)
# Description of Changes We can't convert to TS7 completely yet because it lacks the TS API, so ESLint and some of our scripts don't work, but we can do [what the TS team suggest and run TS6 and TS7 side-by-side](https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/progress-on-typescript-7-december-2025/#compiler). When we do that, we take the `task frontend:typecheck:all` job from ~76s to ~13s, and everything else continues to work as it did before. I've set it so that CI will still use TS6 for the time being and locally we use TS7 out of an abundance of caution because CI time doesn't really matter but local time does. I do think it was a bit pointless doing that since the TS team claim the type checking performs identically, but we might as well have it like that for now. If it happens to go badly locally for any devs, they can use `CI=true task frontend:typecheck` to revert to use TS6 trivially. |
||
|
|
3f7e898c69 |
Add sources service and frontend (#6774)
# Description of Changes Redesign policies backend to treat sources a lot closer to how the frontend imagined them working (they're persistent now and have an API). Then connect the portal to the sources when mocks are off to allow for source creation in the UI. It's not particularly useful to do that right now because there's no policies UI, but I've tested manually that sources set up in the UI are usable by policies created via the API. I had to change the portal so that when mocks are off, it doesn't just hard crash when attempting to connect to all the backend APIs that don't exist yet. It'll still log the errors, but just continues on rendering the UI now. I also changed all the policies backend APIs to be gated behind a flag instead of behind the SaaS profile. This is because we haven't yet got the payment model sorted, but we're going to need this stuff running self-hosted to be able to test it locally. |
||
|
|
5be9a0e1df |
fix desktop bundles (#6773)
# Description of Changes Changes - Use 127.0.0.1 instead of localhost for the local backend. The bundled backend starts on a random port and binds the IPv4 wildcard, but the frontend health-checked http://localhost:{port}. On macOS (and some Linux) localhost resolves to IPv6 ::1 first, so the connection is refused and every backend-dependent tool shows "backend offline" even though the backend started fine. Switched getBackendUrl() and the health-check URL to the 127.0.0.1 loopback literal (already in the Tauri HTTP capability allowlist, and what the OAuth loopback server already uses). Client-side tools were unaffected, which matches the reports. - Fail the desktop build when the bundled JRE is older than the app JAR. The app JAR is compiled for Java 25, but the bundle could ship an older runtime/jre (jlink:runtime short-circuits on an existing runtime, and nothing checked its version), producing UnsupportedClassVersionError at launch so the backend never starts. Added a jlink:verify task that reads the jlink release file and fails the build if the bundled JRE major is below REQUIRED_JAVA (25, kept in sync with build.gradle modernJavaVersion). It runs after the runtime is staged - including the short-circuit reuse path that lets a stale JRE slip through. Cross-platform Node script, no new dependencies. --- ## Checklist ### General - [ ] I have read the [Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings ### Documentation - [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/) (if functionality has heavily changed) - [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags) (for new translation tags only) ### Translations (if applicable) - [ ] I ran [`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md) ### UI Changes (if applicable) - [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached (e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR) ### Testing (if applicable) - [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests pass - [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing) for more details. |
||
|
|
f2b65f4a77 |
Make pre-commit scripts more OS-agnostic (#6724)
# Description of Changes Fix #6723 |
||
|
|
1816bad1ba |
Unified auth for portal and editor (#6725)
# Description of Changes Refactor frontend auth to the shared folder and hook it up to both the portal and editor so they share the same system. Also adds various tasks to help run the portal, including `task dev:portal` to spawn the portal with the backend, and `task dev:portal:proxy` to spawn the editor, portal and backend, and a reverse proxy (at localhost:3000) to allow you to use both at once to simulate how this will actually be deployed, allowing you to check whether the seamless transition between the two actually works. |
||
|
|
c8925acee7 |
add prerendered Open Graph previews and OG card generator (#6661)
# Description of Changes add prerendered Open Graph previews and OG card generator so that /compresss etc shows a pre generated static html file (Since google etc doenst render javascript) --- ## Checklist ### General - [ ] I have read the [Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) - [ ] I have read the [Stirling-PDF Developer Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have read the [How to add new languages to Stirling-PDF](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md) (if applicable) - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings ### Documentation - [ ] I have updated relevant docs on [Stirling-PDF's doc repo](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-Tools.github.io/blob/main/docs/) (if functionality has heavily changed) - [ ] I have read the section [Add New Translation Tags](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/devGuide/HowToAddNewLanguage.md#add-new-translation-tags) (for new translation tags only) ### Translations (if applicable) - [ ] I ran [`scripts/counter_translation.py`](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/docs/counter_translation.md) ### UI Changes (if applicable) - [ ] Screenshots or videos demonstrating the UI changes are attached (e.g., as comments or direct attachments in the PR) ### Testing (if applicable) - [ ] I have run `task check` to verify linters, typechecks, and tests pass - [ ] I have tested my changes locally. Refer to the [Testing Guide](https://github.com/Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF/blob/main/DeveloperGuide.md#7-testing) for more details. --------- Co-authored-by: EthanHealy01 <80844253+EthanHealy01@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
eb08e60d67 |
Redesign pre-commit commands to run through Task (#6670)
# Description of Changes The `pre-commit` commands in this repo are inconsistent with the rest of the dev workflow, as they are impossible to run through Task and they can cause CI to fail with no way for a developer to run the `pre-commit` scripts after they've failed. This PR adds `task pre-commit` (and `task pre-commit:fix`) and then hooks up the existing `pre-commit` hooks and CI to call the Task rule, so if developers are using pre-commit hooks then they should still work, but they're also runnable without using pre-commit at all. I think it'd be worth reviewing what we're actually running at pre-commit in the future because I'm not entirely convinced by all of the scripts that we are running, but this should at least make what we have properly enforced and usable by all devs. |
||
|
|
0c503cc41d |
Fix all top-level dev tasks treating engine as enabled (#6705)
# Description of Changes Currently, `task dev` explicitly calls the backend with `AIENGINE_ENABLED=true` even though it isn't being spawned, so you just get a dead FAB in the UI. This PR fixes it so that the engine will only be enabled for tasks that will actually spawn the engine. It also fixes a bug with the chat which makes it unusable locally. The API path was not going through `apiClient` so for local dev you end up with `//api/v1/...` which is not a valid path, so you get CORS errors when trying to connect to the AI engine. |
||
|
|
13af10a6d1 |
Redesign policy running (#6609)
# Description of Changes Redesign policy running so the server is in charge of policy IDs and running, to make it impossible to have the frontend miss the results. This solves a minor bug that we currently have in policies, where if you load a file and then refresh while the policy is running, you'll never receive the outputted file. |
||
|
|
cd7264a76a |
refactor(fe): share the SaaS PAYG experience with desktop via a cloud/ layer (#6649)
Co-authored-by: James Brunton <jbrunton96@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
04d68c650a |
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into saas-update
# Conflicts: # engine/src/stirling/documents/pgvector_store.py |
||
|
|
2a905c01c3 |
SaaS tidying (#6665)
# Description of Changes * Remove complex port selection logic from `engine.yml`. It's inconsistent with the frontend & backend task files, and caused issues with Docker, which have been worked around but would be simpler to just get rid of the problem altogether * Fix Ruff formatting of Python script * Remove payg tests which are failing and have drifted too far from the implementation to save directly |
||
|
|
1fa1293b39 | chore(build): upgrade Gradle wrapper and Docker build images to 9.5.1 (#6501) | ||
|
|
d48017a5b5 | Skip engine free-port probe in containers (fixed port) | ||
|
|
d52c7ced7c |
Improvements to Stirling Engine to prepare for SaaS release (#6603)
# Description of Changes - Use pool for postgres connections - Add ability to require user ID to be set on API calls to the engine - Add process-wide concurrency cap on AI access (in addition to existing user caps) - Allow number of workers (threads) to be specified for stirling engine - Update env var names to reflect that the DB is not just for RAG |
||
|
|
68e031ac55 |
Policies tidying (#6587)
# Description of Changes * Improve typing of API (breaking change but unreleased, frontend also updated in this PR) * Add ownership concept to policies * De-AI the comments * Update the `task dev:saas` rule to spawn the engine as well |